Yeah, they should get their 5th "vaccine" together. Like Michael Jackson once said: "It's a loving thing"
Every single thing you said here is wrong (except the rich boy part). At least you are consistently stupid. You’ve never made a post about the vaccine or COVID that’s proven correct. You probably mask in the shower. I’ve been surrounded by thousands of people every month. Never mask. Never tested. Unjected. UnAfraid. We are NOT the same. See I understand how vaccines work. YOU DON’T. You rely on someone to tell you what to do (government, doctor, health ‘experts’, media). THEY’VE ALL BEEN LYING TO YOU. Sleep through it at your own peril.
LOL. What a moronic post, even by your standards. Trumpy got his booster - greatest shot ever created. AND YOU BELIEVE HIM??? You are off brand here, moron. Stick to your brand which is OrangeManBad everything. You can’t think for yourself. You are so confused you are following even what your most mortal enemy has told you to do. Imagine having your brain turned to such mush? Line up for your bivalent mouse shot, dipshit! Maybe you can learn about viral interference along the way.
The words of the guy who died: IF I DIE, YOU WERE RIGHT. He wrote it, not us. He also claimed that if he suffered no ill effect, we would be wrong and should admit it. You are correct. This pro-vaxxer was not using statistically valid logic for either outcome. (I've come to expect that from pro-vaxxers almost to a person. I see it in some vax skeptics, too, but most use more rigorous logic, good to excellent statistical analysis, and sound (but not bulletproof) premises. I am happy to refer you to some of the better analysts if you happen to be interested in examining counterarguments to your position. Your perspective could be useful! Jump in.) But you are somehow blaming the skeptics as having flawed logic for simply reposting what this person said.
reply to question: How do you know the man died from the vax? Obviously, in this case, no one can know unless they perform an autopsy. But those are heavily discouraged at present, so autopsy appears unlikely to happen. We do have this Congressional testimony from Peter McCullough, MD, who has sat on multiple safety review boards and has a bibliography of 600+ peer reviewed publications. Most published cardiologist in the world, in fact. As an expert, he testifies that the vaccines are killing people based on autopsies 'conclusions are crystal clear.' https://rumble.com/v1mszqu-are-the-kids-ok.html McCullough speaks at about 1 minute in.
Super healthy 60 year old bodybuilders die from a massive heart attacks all the time! Someone very close to me - super healthy, never spent a day in the hospital - 6 days post booster his heart rate fell to 30 BPM. Almost died. Now has a pacemaker. Brought to you by Pfizer.
I don't care if he got it or not, he is promoting it, he is blaming deaths on people who did not get the vaccine and yet he is worshipped by anti-vaxxer morons like you WITH HIS PICTURE ON. You post lame insults without ever addressing that point, everybody can see through that bullshit. TAKE THE BOOSTER LIKE YOUR DADDY TOLD YOU
Sure, but in any singular case, without laboratory evidence, it's not valid to claim certainty. We cannot know that any particular person died from vax without autopsy or extremely tight time correlation (parking lot post-vax, for example). It seems more credible to say something like - 90% likelihood, imo, that X died of the vaccine based on increases in that particular condition in the vaccinated and in the VAERS database. to say - it's simply a style of discussion. I don't like to name-call (though I sometimes feel the urge) precisely because when someone name-calls it is an ad hominem (rhetorical fallacy) and it diminishes the person who does it. It weakens their arguments because they appear to be acting from emotion rather than reason. It also attacks the person rather than the arguments, which is useless. I take the high road (until I slip up and respond angrily) because it is more practical. imho.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/14/health/early-onset-cancer-increase/index.html Rise in cancers. very recently. "Unknown factors." Never mentions vax as even a possibility. mentions "obesity, inactivity, diabetes, alcohol, smoking, environmental pollution and Western diets high in red meat and added sugars, not to mention shift work and lack of sleep. And there are many unknown risk factors as well, like a pollutant or like food additives. Nobody knows,” he said. These factors have existed for decades, so could not possibly count towards a sudden surge in cancers over a few months period. Maybe it wasn't the vaccines, maybe something else. But they refuse to investigate. Why? Because it very likely is the vaccines.
Sudden surge = More testing after two years of hospitals busy with overload of covid cases. Why are you right wingers so dumb? Peddling anti vax conspiracies that you see on facebook.