This is another one of the professors of whom you know more than... without even reviewing the data or his study? What a garbage attack the messenger not the message... bullshit trick. You are so full of shit. Yes some people were critical because he did not dreate perfect Covid study, His subject were not perfectly random (nor did he claim them to be) and the critics were complaining the antibody tests were not perfect. But, none of them are and he used the best ones from what I read. And so what. Of course they are critics. There is a whole doomer / media quote industry right now. And its not his fault the antibody tests are not 100 percent. Frankly the more I read... I am not so sure even the live virus tests are that good. This is all bullshit models and bullshit data and questionable testing. The lockdown was never based on science or data... If the hospital beds are open the low risk and healthy should never have been lockdown.
That is interesting...thanks for pointing it out. people organized on their own... wore masks protected the elderly went on strike to force the govt to close the border and refused to listen to the govt in other ways nicely done https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/05/how-hong-kong-beating-coronavirus/611524/
You can continue supporting a clown who is funded by the CEO of JetBlue to produce material that COVID-19 is harmless.... or actually look at reality. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...avirus-wasnt-that-deadly.344869/#post-5101816
you are a fucking nuts doomer. When I read that propaganda shit.. I told you it was $5,000 dollars to subsidize the study.
All these so called academics are funded by someone. They do not work for free. Of course, whoever, funded the study will get their views supported by academia. It is called conflict of interest. No different when they said coffee is bad for you and there was a study for it. Then, the coffee group launched their own study and they now said coffee has health benefits. So, who do you believe? It does not end there. You have those against avocados, remember that? Avocados are bad for you then, another study avocados are actually, good and healthy for you. And extreme liberal media? They are the biggest liars pulling their bogus studies out of their asses. It does not take much to pay an extreme liberal academic hack to tell you the world is ending tomorrow. Panic and hysteria being promoted by extreme liberal media and even Dr. Fauci walking back his statements on a 2nd wave? No hospitals are not being overwhelmed and actually, doctors and nurses have been laid off. Not enough work left for them to do when everything is focused on Corona Virus. Everything else does not matter?
Yes, the CFR (Case Fatality Rate) appears to be around 3 or 4%. The IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) which is only a estimate (relative to unreported cases) is most likely between 0.3 and 0.8 percent. The CFR is used when properly discussing the fatality rate of a disease since it is known & proven.
GWB, you were asked to provide your military records, since you seem to be living off the achievements of others. When are you going to tell the world what you did?