Why don't you contact Pfizer and ask the if Yeardon was ever their Chief Scientific Officer. He is giving himself a title he never had at the company. or just go back through the Pfizer press releases and find us the one where Yeardon was appointed the Chief Scientific Officer.
I just posted an article, you started attacking the guy as a nut case, etc. I then posted his bio, as listed from the original source, not ZH - doesn’t seem like a nut case? I could care less, but your opinion means nothing.
Credibility matters. Your source merely pushes nonsense on fringe sites -- he has no integrity -- even trying to "enhance" his job title.
Here’s the catch, everyone here knows what side of the fence you’re on when it comes to Covid. You adhere to the “official MSM doom & gloom narrative” Hence anything that opposes your view is automatically labeled, nutcase, misinformation, whatever. In relation to the rapid-tests that are currently being used to identify Covid infections, I’ve heard it from two different doctors that they are 50-50. One said and I quote, “might as well flip a coin”. Testing is way over-rated, if you’re sick or feeling off, stay at home and away from people, it’s that simple. Testing for asymptotic individuals is nothing more than a crap shoot. So when I read an opposing article that resonates with what I’ve personally heard from people in the medical field, I have to question the validity of the current Covid narrative and wonder if the actual “truth” is somewhere in between.
And that's why people oppose deregulation and Trumpian jawboning of the FDA and CDC. You end up with shit tests