There are a fair number of traders who's performance is on display on the RAPACapIntro website, in all cases the NAV is provided, and helps gauge how serious traders are with their strategies. I would suggest Cornix to join these traders (MT4 or IB required, I believe), or short of that, at least provide the same level of transparency. Also, since it is your journal Cornix, may be you could provide your "definition" of TA, and which aspects of TA you are using in your trading. Good trading to you
I have never blew up in my whole trading career. Simply optimized my time: instead of sitting 10 hours in front of the screens I now spend 3-4 hours in total and mostly in the evenings which suits my schedule better for family reasons. Also NQ moves better lately, because low interest rates resulted in FI and FX going dull while risk is on with stocks.
To stop the nonconstructive and off-topic discussion on the blotters I suggest the following (RM's idea inspired me): if anyone from the regulars (obviously not some suspicious aliases registered in June 2013, lol) doubts my blotters or claims of the trades, you are welcome to publicly announce it here and bet say $10,000 (ten thousands US dollars, to make it feel serious) on that fact, also publicly in the thread so that everybody sees and a few witnesses among regular forum members confirm it. I then privately provide a rock solid proof (such as an official postal version of the statements or similar being faxed or postal mailed to you) of the fact that all of the trades posted here and only those trades were done in at least one live account since the date of the thread start. If I fail to provide such a proof, I openly say here that I lost the bet and owe you $10,000 (ten thousands US dollars) in which case, if I also fail to pay you are more than welcome to expose me as a liar and a scam artist. Case closed. I don't want to spend my time discussing blotters credibility anymore. So if anyone doubts, put the money behind your words, we're traders here, not just posters, right?
Oracle, I'm not much into ES and CL, my toy for the last months is NQ. Thinking of coming back to 6E part-time as well and adding ES as a backup instrument (sometimes NQ doesn't have a good signal and ES does).
Thanks for the comments, Mark. Sorry I didn't mean to claim nobody before proved this fact, I am more than sure many did and I know that you do it every day with amazing consistent results (outside of ET). Just wanted to present my version of the history so to say.
Immediately after ISM report. As for the charts, I'd prefer not go off-topic and direct the debate into particular setups/patterns etc.
Notice, I didn't claim I prove TA works. I said time will show. I trade solely based on TA (which is - candlestick price charts only to make trading decisions). Maybe I prove the opposite and epically blow up here, who knows.
Yea, we certainly have some huge egos here in the thread among us. As my goal is not their satisfaction, please expect my posting pace to slow down to basically posting daily/weekly/monthly blotters and answering some constructive questions maybe. And whoever doesn't like anything or doubts... I posted the solution already.
I posted time stamped blotters (prints was my term); I am fairly sure MS does not know how to read such. Neither did Pekelo, ET's defacto head educator.
A few wrong claims to correct: 1) Goal is show if TA works for me or not. Maybe it won't. It's really hilarious how you started to defend even before I provided any serious arguments. 2) Already posted regarding statements, if you have any doubts, why not make $10K or put me down forever as a scam artist? BTW, blotters will be continuous with overlapping trades without any "gaps". Losing days and weeks WILL happen, believe me. 3) I never was BANNED from your journal. Just got tired of useless argument there and left. Nobody forced me to do so, ever. If you doubt, ask Magna.