Where did he say that? “I’m sympathetic to the government position that they didn’t have much of a choice,” Squillace told me.
LOL, GOPers in Congress will go against Trump when the President has wide discretion on foreign policy? Are you kidding me?
Old news Federal Judge Allows Construction to Proceed in ConocoPhillips’ Willow Project in Alaska https://defenders.org/newsroom/fede...-proceed-conocophillips-willow-project-alaska
Who? Mcarthy will? What can Mcconnell do if Trump refuses to send weapons to Ukraine? Support his impeachment? While the US Congress has approved billions of dollars in support for Ukraine to be distributed over an extended timeframe, as president, Mr Trump could use his executive power to slow down or even stop that support. He did this before when president, for some congressionally approved military aid. Some of his Republican colleagues were quick to condemn his remarks, but it is possible - or even probable - that if Trump were elected in November 2024, US backing for the war effort could end entirely. At the very least, the full-throated support for Ukraine that the current administration has expressed, along with its aggressive diplomatic efforts to maintain a united front with European allies on Russia sanctions, would in all likelihood be greatly diminished. In the UK, which is ramping up its assistance to Ukraine to now include long-range missiles, there are concerns about the implications of a Trump presidency. If Mr Trump cuts off the supply of weapons, the war will end on Russian terms, which is the West's worst nightmare, says the former head of Britain's secret service, Sir Alex Younger. "Putin didn't have a Plan B when he invaded Ukraine but this is now his Plan B - to wait it out." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65573756