Cooling for 58 years... based on raw NOAA data!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Mar 11, 2016.


  1. jem, you detestable liar, it's the fucking greenhouse effect and you know it you fucking liar/lawyer (same thing). Go fuck yourself.
     
    #21     Mar 15, 2016
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    I thought you were going to put him on ignore... ?
     
    #22     Mar 15, 2016
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    yeah right.
     
    #23     Mar 15, 2016
  4. jem

    jem

    really... it not greenhouse theory... its greenhouse fact...

    you know its not Ozone
    you know its not aerosols
    you know its not water vapor
    you know its not the elimination of the some of the gases your industry created?
    you know its not any other part of the environment or the sun.

    You absolutely know that its greenhouse effect.
    you have no mind for uncertainty in science.
    you are the drone george orwell warns about.

    wow... I have a question... how many papers can you find in which the scientists say for sure its the greenhouse effect that causes stratospheric cooling... can you present a few links, I would like to read them. I know one from a hundred years ago that made that prediction... but are there other scientists who have your religious certainty?








     
    #24     Mar 15, 2016

  5. Sorry. He's back on ignore. Serves me right for taking him off. Problem is that I don't want his lies to go uncorrected.
     
    #25     Mar 15, 2016
  6. Snarkhund

    Snarkhund

    The raw data shows no warming therefore the assignment of cause to human activity is moot.

    There is no global warming so there can be no human caused global warming. See how that works?
     
    #26     Mar 15, 2016
  7. jem

    jem

    of course... until the next thread.
    fc is a no science fraudboy.

     
    #27     Mar 15, 2016
  8. maxpi

    maxpi

    There is a job for fc. It's related to Obamacare. He can stand outside a doctor's office and make people sick
     
    #28     Mar 15, 2016
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    upload_2016-3-15_17-26-24.png

    Look at it this way. If scat can have over 300 people on his ignore list no one can criticize you for having a couple on yours.
     
    #29     Mar 15, 2016