convexx's "hitting bids and lifting offers" ETF options

Discussion in 'Journals' started by convexx, Sep 13, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. convexx

    convexx

    #51     Sep 19, 2014
  2. convexx

    convexx

    US-shares above n-period MA. Dailies. Not looking good for equities here.

    [​IMG]
     
    #52     Sep 19, 2014
  3. convexx

    convexx

    lol MBLY will be off to the races above 48.5. No position. I don't trade these things, but I'd reco going long a touch of 48.50; with a $44 stop and a target of 53.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2014
    #53     Sep 19, 2014
    formal gold likes this.
  4. convexx

    convexx

    #54     Sep 19, 2014
  5. convexx

    convexx


    OUT NQ futs 91.00. +10pts.
     
    #55     Sep 19, 2014
  6. donnap

    donnap

    I hear ya, bro.

    Yeah, right. That'll be testing the limits of your discipline.


    Thanks for posting. Fascinating stuff.
     
    #56     Sep 21, 2014
  7. convexx

    convexx

    Last edited: Sep 22, 2014
    #57     Sep 22, 2014
  8. convexx

    convexx

    #58     Sep 22, 2014
  9. convexx

    convexx

    #59     Sep 22, 2014
  10. convexx

    convexx

    I'll comment here because the thread is closed to new replies. The Patrick Agate email is meaningless. It's not "verification" of anything.

    I never stated that the $486K debit was the spread notional. It's a debit. There is no reference transaction on the transfer. I posted one of two accounts traded in a PM job I held in 2004 with a transfer. There is no "verification" that the $486K means anything other than a debit from the account. In no way, shape or form does that prove anything other than some money was moved from the account.

    Here's an $876 debit related to a transfer, w/destination: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5tc2r8ahxhwrrp0/1Y9Gg0n (1).png?dl=0

    What was the original (2006) funding of the account? $486K? $800K? $2,000,000?

    There is no proof of anything other than $486K was removed from the account. He is now posting that he has, "third-party" verification. God help him if he's stating so based-upon the Pat Agate email.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2014
    #60     Sep 22, 2014
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.