Consistently Profitable Day Traders

Discussion in 'Professional Trading' started by Norm, Feb 11, 2005.


  1. So basically, anything less than a billion isn't "real money"? :confused:
     
    #171     Feb 16, 2005
  2. In this context yes, sheesh people it's not a hard concept to grasp here.

    I am just saying that Daytrading RICHES are a myth compared to other styles, vehicles and methods of Trading.

    The public perceptions are not about traders making $150-200 k per year when it comes to this and in my opinion that's what it realistically should be.

    Ok good day to you all please don't respond to my posts on this anymore I've made my point and I'm entitled to my opinions based on my experiences with it.
     
    #172     Feb 16, 2005
  3. What would constitute a response? Does it have to be substantive, or could I just say, YO MAMA!?
     
    #173     Feb 16, 2005
  4. Most people go through life and never accumulate the 3 to 5 million dollars that you refer to as schmuck or moron money. This amount of money may or may not be meaningful to you. Regardless, it is not a reason to condescend because I assure you that it does not impress.

    You are, in effect, calling just about everyone here a schmuck and a moron. Try not to be too surprised at a cool reception. In the meantime, while you relax in between your position trades, may I suggest that you add the following item to your reading list?

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...104-6158588-2440739?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
     
    #174     Feb 16, 2005
  5. yenzen

    yenzen

    there is no reason to believe him anyway. Afterall, how many multi millionaires are so obsessed with recovering a small amount of money on the trading systems they bought and/or even facing possible litigation for violation of agreements. Oh, and lets not forget the computer he was trying to sell as well.

    Mr. Zen
     
    #175     Feb 16, 2005
  6. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    Daytrading is a career, an occupation. It's not about "riches". Those who trade full time tradeoff risk with the rewards. To take unnecessary risk to try for constant "home runs" (and the apparent "riches") is foolish trading. I prefer singles and the occasional extra base hit.

    How many engineers, accountants, software developers, etc. are reaping "riches" from their respective careers?
     
    #176     Feb 16, 2005
  7. only 1% of folks 65 or older have accumulated 5 million or more in total assets.

    only 4% have over 1 million

    56% age 65 are still working

    and 18% are dead broke and live exclusively on S.S.


    These stats are from Primerica USA, financial services.

    Amazing to think about that.
     
    #177     Feb 16, 2005
  8. Are these percentages measured out of "people still alive at that age" (i.e. ignoring those who are not) or "the whole of society" (in which case there must be a small group defined as "already deceased" or something similar?)
     
    #178     Feb 17, 2005
  9. Turok

    Turok

    Samson:
    >Ok good day to you all please don't respond to my
    >posts on this anymore

    LOL...in other words: "I want the last word so please don't respond".

    If you don't want to have a conversation, the first step is to stop talking.

    JB
     
    #179     Feb 17, 2005
  10. sonnet

    sonnet

    opinion you can find the best most consistent edges over short durations of time.

    On the minus side, if u have no edge it is harder to "get lucky" because u have more cost and you are less likely to hit a blue moon trade that will "make" you, which is the reality of many traders "success".

    Making 150k a year is ok but, a day trader has potential to make 10,20,30,40,50+ times that amount.

    It really depends on how good you are and the size of your cahones more than anything else. Little cahones, little reward.
     
    #180     Feb 17, 2005