Conservatives: Always on the wrong side of history.

Did that mean they approved of it? Yes, or No?

 

Slavery dejure has not been in effect for that long, you are right. But if that were the case.....


WHY DID THEY NEED A CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964?

 

You base that assertion on people who have tried to force communism. I personally don't think certain cultures can share communally without becoming violent, so I can see your perspective.

 

But the British ended slavery first....why?

 

Simple, they didn't need it.

I haven't had a chance to ask them, but presumably if they owned slaves they approved.

 

So...should we segregate then?

 

No, let them blow themselves up, as they surely will, one way or the other.

 

Great, then you understand why their foundation was a house built on sand, per their own Christian principles.

God has a very dim view of hypocrites.

 

communism requires force, the second someone thinks your sharing scheme isn't fair then you must point a gun at them. more important would be the forced work distribution from a central planner, I can't imagine many societies that could work like that and really be happy about it.

forced sharing is antithetical to freedom and liberty, which was the foundation of the united states. People want freedom, it is fundamental

 

You arrogantly presume too much, I know no such thing.

Tell you that himself did he?

Next time you talk to him can you find out for sure if I'm really going to Hell?