I don’t doubt Moore will win the senate seat but I am pretty surprised to see so much vocal right wing support for him considering the overwhelming evidence.
I must have missed the "overwhelming" evidence. Unless you're referring to the christmas greetings in the yearbook.
They voted for the pussy grabber with 17 accusations of sexual assault and misconduct.I'm surprised but not that surprised.
Actually if you read most of the posts from people who lean right in this forum the past few days -- you will find that most believe that Moore should step out of the race and this set of allegations at this point may not be fully proven but are disqualifying. The primary argument is over why similar sexual misconduct allegations are not disqualifying to politicians on the left, and if the Washington Post has become little more than a tabloid rag.
Pro rapist Tony Stark might have to change his alias again. Pedophile exGROPer won't. He is proud of his actions.
They are disqualifying to politicians on the left.Sex scandels ends most democrat politicians careers (Weiner,Spitzer,Kilpatrick,David Wu,John Edwards,Gary Condit etc)
You have a point. Yet why do liberals so strongly defend Bill Clinton -- as the Atlantic pointed out the lefts support for Bill Clinton's behavior by Gloria Steinem & others set back justice for women by at least two decades.
2 of Bill Clinton's accusers made their accusations AFTER both of his elections.Democrats would not have elected Clinton President with 3 accusations imo unlike Trump who republicans elected with 17. People also consider that 1 accuser stated under oath that Clinton did not rape her and another Kenn Starr said repeatedly lied under oath in his investigation and dismissed her because she was lying so much