Those are facts of the case,not my opinion.I didn't give my opinion.The fact that you think the facts of the case and the accusers words and actions are an attack on their credibility means you question their credibility.
Irrelevant. An allegation was made by a woman that Bill Clinton raped her. By the current standards set and accepted by the left, allegations are now considered factual evidence, therefore Bill Clinton is now a rapist. Period. Denial of allegations is no longer an acceptable defense. Don't blame me, you guys made the new rules.
you wrote that all you did was this... "I posted the women's words, actions and facts of the case.You seem to think their words and actions are a credibility issue.." but you started your post with the defense raised by Clinton allies. Supporters of Clinton have questioned her account by noting that Broaddrick continued to support Clinton those are not her words or the facts... they are a spin of the facts by clinton's supporters. you are bigger liar that bill clinton himself.
Those are facts of the case jem,not my opinion.When discussing the case am I only supposed to post what the accuser and her supporters said and not be able to post what Clinton supporters said
It is a fact That Clinton supporters questioned her accusations.It is a fact she didn't know the date Clinton supposedly raped her.It is a fact she supported and appeared at public events on Clinton's behalf after he supposedly raped her.It is a fact that she stated under oath that Clinton DID NOT rape her.
The best article I have seen on Bill Clinton recently was in another thread here. It is an Atlantic article pulled up by Google Play Newsstand. Basically it makes the argument that Bill Clinton's behavior and the left's defense of it (Gloria Steinem & others) set back men being held accountable for their actions by two decades. One quote: "The notorious 1998 New York Times op-ed by Gloria Steinem must surely stand as one of the most regretted public actions of her life. It slut-shamed, victim-blamed, and age-shamed; it urged compassion for and gratitude to the man the women accused. Moreover (never write an op-ed in a hurry; you’ll accidentally say what you really believe), it characterized contemporary feminism as a weaponized auxiliary of the Democratic Party."