In fairness, one congressman from California introduced this bill, and it is unlikely to go anywhere. I'm not sure of the details but the article mentioned military style armor, which I interpret as ceramic plates. I wouldn't mind having some body armor, if only to wear to the range. You have no idea who is handling a weapon next to you. Ceramic plates will stop a rifle round, but they are expensive. I've never even seen them advertised, but I suppose there are places you can buy them. If you are worried about the time when TSHTF, they are probably a better thing to have than yet another trick 1911.
Doubt it. If you get into an armed confrontation with the police/military... they're going to have 10-20+ high-powered weapons on you... your single AR-15 or .308 isn't going to give you even a slim chance. You can have home defense weapons, and hopefully those will allow you to prevail against 1 or 2 thieves/marauders... but not against government force. Shoot, the government nowdays sends 20-member SWAT teams to raid a suspected pot dealer or meth lab. What chance do you think you and your body armor would have?
That figures Yeah but how does/would congress interpret it? These are the same buffoons afraid of slings, flash suppressors and those scary pistol grips.
I'm not planning to take on the police or military. I'm talking about situations where there is a breakdown in order, eg Katrina or Ferguson.
Geez... I hate to think wearing body armor was a reasonable precaution to "conditions" anyplace in America.