Excellent video detailing problems of vax approval for children from Covid Care Alliance - the group of doctors who showed the fraud in the Pfraudzer first trials. https://rumble.com/v1cc9ud-stop-the-shots.html
Blah blah blah, this from the guy who couldn't read a study for himself, your thread title is wrong but people should take your advice on adverse reactions after 285 million doses? I asked for confirmation of your reports, you didn't have an answer so you posted a word salad deflection hoping no one will notice. Keep trying bozo.
I read the study and unlike you I understand it. Your DNA is impacted by the clot shots. Immune repair and liver problems thanks to experimental gene therapy they lied about. More studies will come. You have AIDS.
You clearly didn't read the study, only cancerous cells DNA are impacted because they replicate and that's something which happens with COVID itself., Try again retard.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...g-NIH-CDC-droves-embarrassed-bad-science.html https://www.commonsense.news/p/us-public-health-agencies-arent-following the science. "At the NIH, doctors and scientists complain to us about low morale and lower staffing: The NIH’s Vaccine Research Center has had many of its senior scientists leave over the last year, including the director, deputy director and chief medical officer. “They have no leadership right now. Suddenly there’s an enormous number of jobs opening up at the highest level positions,” one NIH scientist told us. (The people who spoke to us would only agree to be quoted anonymously, citing fear of professional repercussions.) The CDC has experienced a similar exodus. “There’s been a large amount of turnover. Morale is low,” one high level official at the CDC told us. “Things have become so political, so what are we there for?” Another CDC scientist told us: “I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I’m embarrassed.” Why are they embarrassed? In short, bad science. The longer answer: that the heads of their agencies are using weak or flawed data to make critically important public health decisions." Yeah, we've been saying that for 2 fucking years now.
You have zero knowledge of science but what Rachel Maddow incorrectly tells you. Leave the science to the scientists. Using a human liver cell line, in vitro, Pfizer mRNA vaccine uses an enzyme called LINE-1, and the genetic code of the vaccine is reverse transcribed into the DNA. Thus altering your genetic code. They said this could never happen. They also said it wouldn’t travel to the liver (it does). They were wrong, as usual, and you were completely duped because you wanted to go to restaurants. You have AIDS Fucking idiot.
The authors used a cancerous liver cell line. This is important for two reasons; both of which were acknowledged by the authors. First, cancerous cell lines replicate, whereas our liver cells typically are not replicating. As such, even if DNA representing the viral RNA was integrated into the cell, no other cells with the altered DNA would be produced. Can you even fucking read YOUR OWN LINK?
Typically! LOOOOOOL Just like the vaccine typically doesn’t travel to the liver or the ovaries or the brain. Except it does. Hahahahhahahhaa… Your debunking just got deboooonked. Your understanding of the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology is unprecedented. Who taught you?
Bunch of random words, went from changing DNA to 'traveling', who said anything about vaccines not being able to travel in the blood, that's the whole point of a vaccine, we are talking about DNA changing and you haven't provided any proof of it.