concept for adjoining (rough) realized index values to the (smooth) interpolated term structure curv

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by steve42, Oct 21, 2023.

  1. destriero

    destriero


    lol no it is not.

    You're modeling the forward here.

    Bro, everything I stated here is accurate and remedial. I can't fix you/stupid.
     
    #41     Nov 5, 2023
  2. destriero

    destriero


    wow, nice moonwalk. You are aware of exactly. shit. And they are arb=.
     
    #42     Nov 5, 2023
  3. steve42

    steve42

    The term 'moonwalk' refers to backtracking or altering a statement when proven incorrect, not to illogical or nonsensical arguments. In our case, the arguments presented were incoherent and invalid, which doesn't align with the concept of 'moonwalking'. My understanding was consistent, but external factors prevented me from articulating this effectively. Our discussion's focus should remain on the logical coherence and validity of arguments, not on misapplied slang terms
     
    #43     Nov 5, 2023
    murray t turtle likes this.
  4. destriero

    destriero

    Are you drunk?






    upload_2023-11-5_17-18-57.png
     
    #44     Nov 5, 2023
    steve42 likes this.
  5. steve42

    steve42

    Well I was trying to be diplomatic about it but you childishly chose to " expose' I'm sure you're mind with a screenshot of something that was clearly meant to be deleted for a reasonI meant what I said that was pretty funny no I'm not but clearly your mom was that would explain a lot fetal alcohol syndrome
     
    #45     Nov 5, 2023
  6. destriero

    destriero


    Dude doesn't know CBOE quotes the synthetic futures. Steve is so blind, dumb and pot-committed to this hit and run thread.
     
    #46     Nov 5, 2023
  7. steve42

    steve42

    The babbling of schizophrenics also makes sense to them. When your communicating with others you have to make sense and that's why I do mathematics and clearly you don't. I'm not asking you to f****** write equations here but formulating technically correct precise statements that are low on word count and high on information ratio would go a long ways towards getting your point across if indeed that was one of your goals. If one of your goals was to spew acronyms in a context where they could mean f****** anything and then few more non-specific garbage and then declare everyone to be an idiot because they can't see into the internals of your autistic brain to see the obvious fact that you just happen to know because for some reason you think people can make sense of your gibberish. Over using dense jargon and technobabble has never f****** helped anything so if you want to restate that s*** in a way that is coherent and makes sense maybe offline put your house back in the seat and pretend you're right in the damn term paper or something and then post something coherent maybe I'll look at it and see wow he was right I didn't know I've had my head up my ass but until then I'm not going to do that because that's not what actually happened
     
    #47     Nov 5, 2023
  8. steve42

    steve42

    Dude you're just making up a different synonym and I'm not sure what pot committed . But anyway welcome back to my s*** list I recommend you take my advice I'm not the first one we thought you're totally full of s*** and put you on the ignore list immediately
     
    #48     Nov 5, 2023
  9. destriero

    destriero


    Yessssss, your master plan! You certainly spent some time on it!
     
    #49     Nov 5, 2023
  10. destriero

    destriero


    Making up a “different synonym”?

    Do tell. Entertain us.
     
    #50     Nov 5, 2023