Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitro, Nov 23, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nitro

    nitro

  2. nitro

    nitro

    Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results
    [​IMG]
    By Dan Merica, CNN

    Updated 10:23 PM ET, Tue November 22, 2016


    [​IMG]

    (CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, according to a source with knowledge of the request.

    The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides on a call last Thursday.

    The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source...

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/index.html
     
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    Hillary stole a few other States, and still couldn't come out on top... That's why she couldn't challenge. Risk discovery...

    unlikely the situation changes now. Lets see. i would like it too...
     
  4. Good1

    Good1

  5. fhl

    fhl

    Trump wins in electoral landslide, but scifientists demand recount!!!!
    [​IMG]


    lmao
     
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading


    Since the difference in the number of votes is less than 10,000, McCrory is free to file for a recount. However with every county level re-count his opponents lead has been getting larger. He was originally behind by 5000 votes, he is now behind by 6500 votes. McCrory should quit while he is ahead and concede.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.