Desperate Andrea Mitchell Badgers Ed Rendell for Possible Vote Recount By Nicholas Fondacaro | November 23, 2016 | 3:23 MSNBC’s resident Hillary Clinton super-fan, Andrea Mitchell, came across as particularly desperate Wednesday as she dedicated a segment of Andrea Mitchell Reports to dreaming of a possible recount in three key swing states. “Some Clinton supporters are trying to mount a campaign to ask for an audit in key states to see if a recount should be ordered,” she reported, “According to a group of election lawyers and computer scientists… there is quote, ‘Persuasive evidence that election results in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan may have been manipulated or hacked.’” http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...rea-mitchell-badgers-ed-rendell-possible-vote
This is not the type of thing - vote rigging - for a democratic country. Why on earth have people difficulties in running elections where there is no doubts about vote rigging? Makes me think of Austria, that is now re-running its presidential elections because of elections irregularities.
Alex Jones predicted Trump would win in a landslide. Evidence is, he did... His calls are mostly accurate. AJ reporting Democrats attempting to scuttle the formal electoral college vote on December 20th.................................................................. be advised.
All kinds of shit going on behind the scenes. Hillary and her entire network are furiously plotting, scheming and shitting their pants. Panicking. Trump can bring down their entire house of cards. He will be given full oversight, or take it, if need be.
We've seen it all before. Democrats stole the dem governors election in Washington by demanding recounts. They stole Al Franken's seat by demanding a recount. They would have stolen the presidential election in 2000 with their hanging chads and such if the supreme court hadn't stopped them. It's always the same. They demand a recount and then once it proceeds, they never stop finding dem votes until they have enough to win, and then the vote counting must stop. If anyone thinks they'd play if different this time, they're nuts. If some shit for brains judge lets this happen, Trump should go full nuclear. Burn the system down.
Its all baloney... http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/election-results-hacked-new-york-magazine-231796 Election statistics gurus Nate Silver and Nate Cohn, who run the data analysis sites FiveThirtyEight and The New York Times’ Upshot, respectively, were quick to push back on the report on Twitter. Among other points, Silver wrote that the effect described in the New York magazine story “completely disappears” after controlling for race and education. “Maybe a more complicated analysis would reveal something, but usually bad news when a finding can't survive a basic sanity check like this,” Silver tweeted. J. Alex Halderman, the Michigan professor in the report, addressed the fervor on social media in a Medium post on Wednesday morning. He wrote that the story included “some incorrect numbers” and “incorrectly describes the reasons manually checking ballots is an essential security safeguard,” but acknowledged speaking to the Clinton campaign.