Study: Black girls reach puberty faster than others A new study shows that girls as young a 7-years-old are experiencing early signs of puberty. The study looks at 1,239 girls ranging from various races. According to the study, 10 percent of white, 23 percent of black and 14 percent of Hispanic girls have "breast stage two" which is known as the first stage of puberty. Dr. Ivor Horn, Pediatrician at Children's Medical Center in Washington, D.C. says these findings are not shocking. "It's not surprising because we are seeing the trend in our practices and I think that this is consistent with a previous study, but it's telling us that unlike the previous study in 1997, more girls are developing at the age of 7 and 8. http://www.thegrio.com/health/study...hing-puberty-faster-than-whites-hispanics.php This study is a comparison of blacks to hispanics, the differences with the average Caucasian onset of puberty highlight even greater differences What can we do about these racist hormones and biological processes!! We need to see if we can get a class action racism suit against them.... I'm sure jesse jackemup can lead the way!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is this one (race) different from caucasian? http://www.genizon.com/english/discovery/quebec_founder_history.html
OK, you are. You arrogantly presume too much. The only thing I see you exposing is your own bias, lack of logic and hypocrisy. Well Mr. computer salesman on the ground it doesn't. But then using the argument that it's OK for me to do it because everyone else is isn't a very intellectual argument, now is it?
OK, you are. Your opinion. You arrogantly presume too much. The only thing I see you exposing is your own bias, lack of logic and hypocrisy. Yes, I would agree that what you see is limited to your own mind's ability to perceive and understand. A dog sees what a dog sees, a monkey sees what a monkey sees, Goober sees what Goober sees. Well Mr. computer salesman on the ground it doesn't. But then using the argument that it's OK for me to do it because everyone else is isn't a very intellectual argument, now is it? Sure it is an intellectual argument. If what I say is true, it doesn't matter if I were lying when I said it. The truth of what is said maintains its status no matter who is saying it. Its truth is independent of who says it. People like you don't understand basic fundamentals of logic and truth. These concepts escape you, apparently. The messenger of a letter has absolutely nothing at all to do with the truth or falsity of the message being delivered. You can believe whatever you like about what I do, it has no bearing on the truth of what I do...as you don't know. You claim to be a taxi driver in the sky, is that true? I don't now, and I don't actually care...I just find it funny that someone boasts about something so banal.
Shared by almost everyone on ET Although I suppose we all could be wrong and only you are right. And a drunken lard ass intellectual wanna be trollZz sees himself as never being wrong even when it's obvious to everyone else. No dopey, it's not.
Shared by almost everyone on ET Although I suppose we all could be wrong and only you are right. Yes, you could be wrong. The majority is often wrong. And a drunken lard ass intellectual wanna be trollZz sees himself as never being wrong even when it's obvious to everyone else. Again, that's your opinion. "Obvious to everyone else" is a logical fallacy, in addition to be lacking supporting fact. Just start a thread with a poll, and I assure you that not everyone will agree with your point of view. Why you even need to bring in the crowd to support your own opinion, just indicates how weak your opinion actually is... No dopey, it's not. Yes, it is.
Phenom There are races, point conceded.......... Ur ducking the question, the question I asked earlier. Compliance to diversity and AA cost 4% GDP per annum What is your plan to stop this egregious amount of waste?
Ducking the question? How is it not implicit? I'd end all forms of systemic discrimination, including AA and "diversity" quotas. I would end all public funding for any racially based aid, or any race based organization or group. I wouldn't outlaw racially based scholarships, organizations, schools, or businesses. They would simply have to survive without public funding. I'd outlaw public discrimination, against whites or any other group. The views of private people and entities on racial issues is outside the scope of government. How is my opinion not apparent?
Actually you got drunk (again) years ago and cried online about being a drunk lard ass whose wife had dumped him like a ton of bricks. Don't need to, your thread ratings alone tell the story dopey. It indicates nothing of the kind.