And that's where we've left these discussions before. I present it, you say it's not genuine, and vice versa. Look, if you were arguing with the mirror opposite of yourself, which one of you would win? Yeah, I know, I'm not a true mirror image of you. And on and on we go. Hence, your thread's very premise.
What you know about economics wouldn't fill the back of a post card, even if your wrote with a crayon. Coward.
But, it's all good, brother Riccie. I pick up stuff from all angles. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Even you're correct sometimes, Riccie...not very often but...
nice deflection of your completely inept position via personal attack For a lie-bral you sure are hung up about my sexuality. You foolishly think it's a weak link in my armor, it isn't. It just makes you sound like a toddler having a tantrum .
It's not that I merely say it's not genuine, I show you proof. Instead of following the normal debate where you challenge my proof if you think it is incorrect, you run off. You can say it's the same thing if you want and keep trying to play for a stalemate, but anyone with an understanding of debate knows that this is how you have an argument (in the literal sense of the word, not "fight).
Of course, you are still in that conservative media bubble even after that beatdown on Tuesday. I expected nothing less.
Alright, keep playing for the stalemate (I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I?). Do us both a favor and put me back on ignore.