Your posts in PNR don't indicate anything you have said here. Makes you wonder about how bad the internet is for exchanging nuanced ideas.
Your Actions and your words say otherwise, you stir up way to much just to keep the dnc trolls inline, on the other hand if you're getting paid that would make sense otherwise you sick Man.
and I note as I read these boards a very high percentage of your posts are cheap or nasty shots out of the blue. I doubt you are that way in real life. so i think you are mistaken if you think you can read a person accurately off et.
it depends on the forum. I my opinion it takes a lot of disciplined to stay civil here because of all the trolls. I admire those who do. I post in between phone calls or in the past trades. I lost patience a long time ago.
Yeah, and it also shows that the school is a bit full of it IMHO, there is very little difference in life-expected value between the top schools (e.g. I doubt someones life would change if they've gone to Cornell vs Harvard) but at some point there is step-down that's very drastic. It's hard to pinpoint what's "the worst good school" exactly is, though. PS. reminds me of my coworker who rearranged his "Stanford" car sticker into "Snodfart"
I think the worst good school (practically speaking) is the lowest ranked school that banks will Recruit at. That's where the life-expected value drops. My experience through my family members and friends who went to Wharton, mit, and Harvard was that they did have better access to opportunities. For example DE Shaw doesn't interview at Cornell but does interview and hire from Harvard. And on the entrepreneurial side the opportunities are even better: which is why there are far fewer tech billionaires from Cornell than from Harvard despite Cornell's engineering being bigger than all of Harvard. The article was about how full of themselves Harvard was. They quoted one college interview where the recruiter asked the prospect what makes them special and the prospect replied "i speak Chinese." The prospect was white. The recruiters response was "1/2 of Harvard speaks Chinese. What else"