So you just proved that you agree the Infowars news is full of shit but you are ok apologizing for it and that it does not matter if they get their facts really wrong because you pick what is true....
You speak above your station methinks. Let's find out... Easy enough. How would you know? lol Did you hear that on the grapevine or did you find that to be true yourself? Harrison Smith presents an excellent 3 hours weekdays. 15 hours to find "full of shit". Show me bud. Ever watch Harrison? or are you a victim of the "poison the well" strategy and merely a self proclaimed 'expert' on the topic? What'd Harrison report that was 'full of shit' specifically or are you full of shit on this topic? One or the other, my man. Your Go. https://www.bitchute.com/video/4yfQmKgUtsrM/
Not 'justifying' anything. Just saying pedo rings are very well verified. You appear to be implying that they do not exist and this is incorrect, in my opinion. It seems a bit weird to say 'all these things are false,' then when someone makes a case they may have some merit to simply dismiss that person's arguments as more of the same. That's kind of a GWB approach. Not that it matters. Like a say, I agree very much with you on the CovFraud and that's the main issue we're facing.
Right, because Russia would be better. What's miserable about my existence, again, RRY? Staying out of sun bathing?
I'm not implying they do or do not exist. Once again, you asked me for examples of Infowars/AJ crazy, and I gave them to you. I'm referring to the Hillary Clinton is running a pedo ring out of a pizza place belief.
Do you have source showing Jones pushing this line or is this more "heard it through the grapevine" poison the well tactic. Where some bullshit ingredient data points are added to a file of data which allows calls by deflection interests to disregard the entire file instead of parsing out the wheat from the chaff in order to make a judgement on the issue. What's your source for your Hillary Clinton post? Did you see a vid of Jones putting that out there? Post it up. Make your case. You Are On.
We dismiss arguments when the only sites pushing it are fringe conspiracy nutcase sites or unbalanced social media posters --- coupled when there is no reliable mainstream sources providing facts supporting the assertions. Quality of the source matters. Claims from crap sources without reliable support should be dismissed out of hand. For example -- the claims that a pizza parlor in D.C. is associated with Hillary Clinton and is the center of pedophile ring is pure QAnon nutcase fringe stuff. This is the type of crap pushed on InfoWars. If you are making the case that Jeffrey Epstein was a center of a pedophile ring which has associations with many politicians and famous people who flew on his Lolita Express plane then you would have a story with factual support -- found in the mainstream media.
The problem is that you dismiss any sites - no matter how well regarded - the moment they trash your Religion™.
Damn - I couldn't let it go. Here's the NBC / Today show version of Hillary ran a pedo ring. Not the same, but... bad enough. apparently, the State Department ran an ugly coverup of some legit pedo activity and blocked any further investigation. Not the same as running a ring, for sure, but implies something pretty grotesque. https://newspunch.com/hillary-clinton-pedophile-ring-state-department/ Video is from Today show. Removed from youtube, but still up on newspunch. Transcript: “Serious allegations concerning the State Department,” the NBC anchor announced, before launching into the disturbing details that mainstream media would be unable to report on in 2017 given the backlash received and cover up that ensued when PizzaGate began circulating. “According to internal State Department memos the agency might have called off or intervened into investigations into possibly illegal, inappropriate behaviour within its ranks allegedly to protect jobs and avoid scandals.” “This concerns a time when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. “There is an old saying in Washington that the cover-up is worse than the crime. But in this case both parts of it are disturbing,” Chuck Todd continued. “Allegations of prostitution and pedophilia, and allegations that those crimes were somehow covered up or not looked into. So the State Department this morning is having to respond to those claims, and those investigations involve misconduct by State Department officials, including an Ambassador and security agents attached to then secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.” “The allegations are that these investigations were whitewashed, quashed altogether, and that those orders came from high up.” “NBC has obtained documents relating to ongoing investigations into some disturbing allegations involving State Department personnel and at least one ambassador. A State Department memo says, quote, “the Ambassador routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children. “The memo also says a top State Department official directed State Department investigators to “cease the investigation” into the ambassador’s conduct.” It’s just one of what another document describes as “several examples of undue influence” from top State Department officials.”