Ah, I see more critical independent thinkers are joining the conversation. The kind that even makes up stuff in their own journal. I am sorry B1S2, track records do matter so I just automatically assume every statement from you is nonsense. I will change my mind if you post some evidence for your statements, but I have a feeling the only thing you could come up with are tweets and links to websites from and for retards. Besides track records quality of sources also matters. (Weird how the critical independent thinkers always seem to forget the basic rules for critical independant thinking)
All mRNA-based injectables, that are being described as vaccines, are inherently incompatible with health. They intentionally & unavoidably cause harm; inducing a human body to express a protein that doesn’t belong, because it’s a “non-self” protein and is therefore recognized as an invader or an aberrant cell, axiomatically initiates lethal autoimmune responses. Someone with an intact immune system will kill every cell that takes up some of the lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA & transcribes it into this purported viral protein. Mike Yeadon, 16 year Chief Science Officer for Pfizer.
Ha ha. I thought "do your own research," was your rule. Ah, but that's what you tell others when you don't want to link your info (if it even exists). When someone else makes a claim it's "Where's your evidence?" I like double standards. And you are good at them.
Here's the evidence. Official medical paper by experts. 73% of suspected vax deaths were vax deaths. translates to general population with error bars around 4.7%. Meaning pretty much all the excess deaths which have weirdly been showing up starting in early 2021 - just after a certain jibby jabby - and accelerated 3Q 2021 - just after a certain mandate and huge increase in jibby uptake - pretty much all those excess deaths are caused, at least partially, by the jibby jab. https://zenodo.org/record/8120771 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death. Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
First: I did provide you the information you need to look for the evidence yourself. The picture you claimed showing all the shots a kid has to take was posted on BMC TV's facebook page (and some other local media) on Jan 10th 2020. And it has nothing to do with your claim. The question is: why didn't you check it out? Second: as I pointed out there are double standards indeed. Once your track record shows you just copy false or misleading information from conspiracy sources and paste them here as 'proof' of your narrative you can't expect people to give you credit. I actually believe you indeed don't see the difference between my posts and B1S2's statement. And that is exactly your problem.
A paper by Peter A. McCullough and other anti-vax clown using fabricated data. Completely laughable and already fully debunked as nonsense. The study has been rescinded as not factual and the pre-prints removed from most medical paper sites. Let's take a look at the statement. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 Abstract This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. Further information is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq
Another good example of your critical thinking. I googled the title of your paper and the first link states: "This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." So in conclusion: no, it is again not proof. It is another attempt by the anti-vax retards to fool all those independant critical thinkers. Oh wait. You posted it here so I am wrong calling it an attempt. What I don't understand is: do you REALLY not question your sources that post these thousands of tweets, claims, false studies etc that get debunked every single time? How can you know that and uncritically believe post 10001? How does that work in your brain?
Over and over again... a mere 30 seconds on Google demonstrate the anti-vax source is complete bullshiat and has been retracted as being fabricated. Yet they never fact check the crap they post --- despite having their nonsense debunked over and over again.