Codifying SCT

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by Joe Doaks, Jan 18, 2009.

  1. I meant 666. I would never put Tums on ignore. I love the whole SCT crew. They lighten up an otherwise dull day trading.
     
    #61     Jan 21, 2009
  2. OK, then strike my previous comment for not being in the spirit of the thread... I'll repent by reading all Jack's old posts after which my mind will be so twisted that I'll believe :)
     
    #62     Jan 21, 2009
  3. For what? Posting my opinion of Jack? Serious question. Tell me what I posted that would warrant my account being deleted.

    You're the one who needs to go, censoring posts with a bias when you're supposed to be a neutral mod.
     
    #63     Jan 21, 2009
  4. Good point, 666! You should be able to say anything shitty over HERE that you want to. Tums, I urge you just to read and enjoy this thread but don't moderate it except for obscenity (well, really BAD obscenity). If you let the pond stagnate all the anti-Jacks will slither over here and leave the rest of ET alone. Sort of a reform school for the B-team.
     
    #64     Jan 21, 2009
  5. What constitutes sabotage, BTW? Don't see that in the TOU, haha. I personally would object to the bad poetry.
     
    #65     Jan 21, 2009
  6. Tums

    Tums

    unless i received a complaint, you can be rest assured, nothing will be touched.
     
    #66     Jan 21, 2009
  7. Hmmm. I suggest a moderating rule that you only delete posts for a complaint if the complainant is a POSTER on that thread. Otherwise the complainant can go elsewhere and screw himself. Especailly THIS thread. Who the hell posting here is going to be offended by ANYTHING posted here, haha!
     
    #67     Jan 21, 2009
  8. Well, codifried SCT dint do tew bad terday. 29.16 net NQ points, 65% of the range. Not bad a-tall fer grossly overoptimized code. I have to hack it a lot during the day to get it that good, but hey, that's how SCT works! Don't like the results? Change the rules!
     
    • jd.jpg
      File size:
      49.9 KB
      Views:
      62
    #68     Jan 21, 2009
  9. How about if we stick to IMpersonal attacks? You know, nuthin' persnal? Thank goodness you aren't offended by vaudeville, broad satire, slapstick and sarcasm.
     
    #69     Jan 21, 2009
  10. For all three of you who stared in amazement at my latest results with chicken-fried SCT, I neglected to mention this version incorporates 14 distinctly different combinations of the most important states of velocitance, peakage, and volumicity as discussed earlier. Of course, with 24 such possible combinations, I am far from done. But the preliminary result is quite gratifying. Thank you all for following along as a dying old man constructs his magnum opus.
     
    #70     Jan 21, 2009