whats your post got to do with history. it is very misleading it was the republicans who passed the civil rights act. and I found this quote on a news max site. It was republicans who help women gain the right to vote. It was ronald reagan who helped free eastern europeans form communist oppression. What the heck limp wristed democrats done .... I will tell you. from newsmax. the record shows that since 1933 Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes.
Why don't you tell him your name and where you live so he can come and take it from ya piker dude, or are you all talk. I wouldn't fuck with optional.
Lincoln using emancipation to build war support only demonstrates further he wasn't such a friend to blacks, and it didn't free them in border states like Kentucky. Lincoln didn't rise above anything, AS ANYBODY KNOWS it was very common at the time to oppose slavery. Lincoln held his views that blacks should be deported right to the end of his life, and you call that rising above? Your portrayal is not only biased tripe, it's almost factually inaccurate. Obama's tribute to Lincoln shows his ignorance. The only thing with his name on it is stimulus, bailout was Bush. If you think spending a 0.75 trillion dollars on the credit card is genius, and a couple trillion of new debt is 'hardly a burp', then you are a moron.
So you're afraid of lard ass know-it-all drunks? And I thought our Canadian friend Gabby was the biggest puss on ET. Agreed Which would make all liberals and democrats Caucasian hating/cross dressing/penis sucking butt pirate/xenophile/cosmopolitan sheepeople? Ignorant haughty assholes... Sounds a lot like California and Detroit today. You mean just like King Hussein Obama?
No I was just screwing with indexpecker, he has a constant diarrhea of the mouth. I know nothing about optional or who is the biggest puss or toughest dude. And I don't won't to find out either.
Are you 12? This is pure cartoonish fantasy nonsense. Go and read the history of RE Lee. He was asked to lead the Union armies and declined. Instead he led the armies of VA against the north out of a sense of duty to protect his homeland of Virginia against the northern agressors. He regretted this duty, but felt honor bound to lead the south. Buchanon's description is definitely slanted, but is bullseye accurate when compared to your nonsense. Slavery was relatively low on the list of disagreements that resulted in secession. Slavery was made a major press issue later to publicly gain the moral highground. This lie is still unfortunately repeated by the uneducated and the intellectually lazy.
How many non slave states fought on the side of the Confederacy? Coincidence? Hardly... The slave states of the confederacy viewed slaves as their personal property, and the current Dixie lovers want to make it appear as if their illegal actions and rebellious Confederacy and subsequent war was fought on the basis of principals of states rights and the Constitution of the United States of America... Bullshit... It was fought because the south did not want to give up what they thought was their God given right to own human beings as property...and these primitives resented the Union and the progressive states from forcing the south into civilization... They are still resisting civilization to this day, and remain booger eating uneducated self absorbed miscreant degenerates... Scum...