I want people to grow a set of balls and learn to take criticism without resorting to ruining someone's reputation. Someone who had nothing to do in influencing the president's decision to tweet his content. Also, I don't know enough to call the guy a bigot or a troll that dabbles in bigotry to get a reaction. Not that it makes a difference in his rights, just painting the alternative to what has been reported.
Just out of curiosity, is there any circumstance under which you could possibly admit you might be wrong? Or is your opinion 100% right under every circumstance?
When I'm wrong I admit it, and have done so many times here on ET over the years. When I'm not, I don't. I don't think I'm wrong here.
So in this scenario can you list a single person who is sticking up for CNN, or a single person who would justify that kind of behavior?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymity#United_States https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_laws_of_the_United_States I've never considered myself more than an independent and the right isn't wrong on this one, even if their motive to be outraged is political and would be completely reversed if the situation was towards Fox news
Thank you "Here4money" its nice talking to people who have an open mind, there isnt really much you can say to somone who claims they are right no matter what happens under any circumstance..... debate is pointless under that scenario.