Hilarious. Vilify her because, thanks to science, everyone knows earth's climate would have no effect on an asteroid's orbit, but vilify scientists who, thanks to science, think the earth is warming!
IOW: It proves nothing, thanks for sharing your expertise. Wanna try again or does a simple question flummox your liberal genius of a brain that bad?
I don't know what you're asking. I haven't been formally taught anything about it either for over 30 years but I do things like read. Do you ever look at the Nat Geo magazine? Watch Discovery channel? Being out of college is no excuse for being ignorant.
1) For a liberal genius you're kinda stupid, can you read or is your attention span shorter than obama's hair? "Pardon me but what EXACTLY do you think the belief in the theory of evolution provides you? I don't get what you folks think it proves." 2) nope, besides everybody knows that's just a porn mag for eggheads, twits & geeks. 3) I don't watch TV haven't for years. 4a) Ignorant? Hell I haven't had a liberal be able to answer my above simple questions in 10 yrs or more.
I've not read all the other comments, but I'm sure we're in agreement here. At best, shoot this news anchor in the head, at worst, remove her reproductive organs. Why is it that prescription-drugged heavily armed phsyco asswipes miss these targets!
Quote from futurecurrents: Being out of college is no excuse for being ignorant. ----------- Then you must have some other reason for being ignorant, FC. You need to see a shrink about it. Seriously.
I've stayed out of the global warming debate because my personal views are in line that humans have to be causing some changes to the climate. What those changes are I am not qualified to say. But your statement above is a very poor comparison. The argument against the idiot in the clip is because of her stupidity. Yes, it is science that tells us any global warming would have nothing to do with an asteroid. But in the second comparison, the argument is against scientists who are allowing their political viewpoints to influence their scientific findings, or are not interpreting the data correctly (or what the opposing side considers to be correct). The first issue is black and white. The second is far more convoluted.