Paypal has more and "better" studies trumping yours saying otherwise, in fact GWB-Trading is their adjudicator, now what? FWIW: My belief that COVID was relatively harmless to infants or that the boosters are fairly useless in preventing acquiring Omicron would at some point or another be labeled "misinformation".
I had charts and shit for my "opinion" so were done as statement of fact. You're saying twitter did not wipe "opinions" under misinformation? <<<I do not oppose that in the least, twitter is a private platform. And before we play the "paypal" is a private company game, they themselves are going after private assets for whatever they may deem misinformation. In fairness thousands did not agree to their TOS and cancelled. If the below comes to pass and Ricter states Russia is not a state of terror (we're stretching it IMO), should paypal take his money?
studies often (as in very often) contradict. Never mind once private interests/money come into play. Plus, it's not like Paypal will be hiring an army of PHDs to parse through the accusations.
It feels good when political "enemies" are punished but one's gotta consider PayPal are just being greedy assholes and hedging on pandering and that the public (for instance you in this case) would be supportive of their actions. Always gotta raise the question, what if "I'm a leftist hippy antivaxxer that is confused about GMOs?", "what if I believe there are only two genders?".