CME Housing Futures

Discussion in 'Financial Futures' started by guy2, May 23, 2006.

Which way is the US housing market going?

  1. The market will continue to rise

    5 vote(s)
    8.9%
  2. The market will flatten out

    8 vote(s)
    14.3%
  3. The market will drop

    35 vote(s)
    62.5%
  4. Don't know or don't care

    8 vote(s)
    14.3%
  1. Pabst

    Pabst

    Here's a link to the components of the S&P 500 industrials.

    http://www.marketvolume.com/indexes_exchanges/sp500_components.asp

    Could you do me a favor and shoot over to me the addresses, square footage and assessed value of the "homes" in the Chicago Housing contract? I want to check a few out. Also are any for sale?

    Do you see the difference between contracts? To-morrow I will know the value of SPX to the 100th decimal. Nobody on FUCKING EARTH knows within perhaps 5% of "last" what the "value" of the Chicago housing market is. I repeat. This is tradesports.com or betonmarkets.com type stuff. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Let two guys over drinks bet a hundo on "direction" in real estate. But as a serious vehicle? Hardly.
     
    #41     Jul 18, 2006
  2. guy2

    guy2

    I don't know the composition of the Chicago Housing index and I'm not going to go hunting for it but it is published and it is possible to arb the actual physical houses against the future. Do you think that the CME would say that if they didn't believe it to be true?
     
    #42     Jul 19, 2006
  3. Pabst

    Pabst

    It's "possible to arb"? Do you see anything in the trade, i.e. volume or tightness in the bid/offer that leads you to believe this product is being arbed? Arbed against what? Are you telling me that if I get lifted on a Chicago futures offer I can immediately buy SFH's in Naperville, Evanston and Skokie, two condo's in Lincoln Park and a partridge in a pear tree and be hedged at delta neutral?

    The CME is a publicly traded corporation trying to sell a product that was expensive to develop. It's been over twenty years since ANY futures exchange has created a successful all new, unique product line. This adds to the list of failures.


     
    #43     Jul 19, 2006
  4. guy2

    guy2

    True - those partridges are impossible to arb.
     
    #44     Jul 19, 2006
  5. Pabst

    Pabst


    I think they used to be deliverable against the CME's old Broiler's (Chicken) contract. :D


    P.S. Sentiment in this thread's poll is so negative that it makes one want to play the fade and buy one of those million dollar mobile homes in Malibu. :p
     
    #45     Jul 19, 2006
  6. guy2

    guy2

    That might not be a bad play. I remember the housing bust in London at the beginning of the 90's and the only areas unaffected were the affluent Chelsea & Kensington, Knightsbridge, and Mayfair where the prices continued to appreciate by 2 to 5% per year while the rest of the city (and country) plummeted. Isn't Angelina Joelie making Brad sell his and Jennifer’s old love nest in Malibu? There's one for you.
     
    #46     Jul 19, 2006
  7. luh3417

    luh3417

    Actually you guys are on to something. Low-end, midrange, and high-end housing markets behave quite differently. And as much as I wish there were an easy hedge for my house (ok, trailer), the fact is, the CME product does not handle the low/mid/high end housing stratification.
     
    #47     Jul 19, 2006
  8. guy2

    guy2

    But do one of the 10 cities behave like low, mid, high end housing markets - i.e. proxy.

    New cities (Vegas) versus old cities (Boston)
    City size...
     
    #48     Jul 19, 2006
  9. 1011101

    1011101

    Are these trading on IB yet? when I try to place an order, i get "No clearing rule found"

    What other brokers let you trade housing futures?
     
    #49     Sep 24, 2006
  10. def

    def Sponsor

    Which contract? I just placed an order for Aug 07 NYM and it went through (ie. went green right away).
     
    #50     Sep 25, 2006