Which is the same Fox News story that you used via "examiner" and your other "major news sources", like "Judicial Watch". While some might call them rightwing rags, you still haven't provided any facts FACTS!!! Where are the FACTS!!!? Even the GOP is backing away from this.
Hey dumbshit .. need I remind you that YOU asked for a link to NY Daily News? And I provided it .... And have you provided any FACTS that no ISIS terrorist have NOT crossed? God, you're dumb!
Which, again, is the same Fox News item quoted by your "major news sources" like "examiner", which is what you used to begin with. As for FACTS that no ISIS terrorist have [sic] not crossed, the statements made by DHS qualify as FACTS, as do the statements by the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Mexican embassy. You just don't happen to like them. OTOH, you have yet to provide a single FACT to support your contention that IS terrorists have crossed the border into Texas. Let's go, doughey. Can you come up with anything better than Fox News? Can you provide any of those FACTS that you value so highly? Anything? Even the National Review doesn't buy this story.
Judicial Watch has been far more credible than the current administration or the major media. They uncovered stuff through court cases that congressional coimmittees had not been able to get and that the media had no interest in getting.
Allegedly. In any case, they haven't provided any support for this contention; just repeating what they saw on Fox News.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...h-Unearths-Jaw-dropping-IRS-Scandal-Bombshell http://online.wsj.com/articles/covering-for-the-irs-1410729249 http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...orced-DOJ-s-Hand-On-Fast-and-Furious-in-Court http://misguidedchildren.com/domest...ors-judicial-watch-fast-furious-scandal/27371 http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...d-by-judicial-watch-over-documents-s-n1902932#! etc etc etc
Now of course DB will say those are only conservative sources. Facts are facts however. Feel free to disprove anything.