The problem with Popper and Soro's philosophy is that they never address the issue that the government is committing the act of theft against it's citizenry . Popper and Soro's also support a quantifiable scientific approach to innovation in society but this is in fact in conflict to a free market were buyer and seller agree a mutual value and once you start the process of implementing the results of the experimentation into society this leads to totalitarianism.
At least someone in these ET forums, besides myself, is interested in these issues. I think this statement of yours: "Popper and Soro's [sic] also support a quantifiable scientific approach to innovation in society", may be quite wrong. (Notice I wrote "may" not "is") So I would like you to elaborate on what you mean, if you can. Popper and Soros both drew/draw a clear line between science and what is not science. Social Science, for example, is not science. And Soros draws very clear lines between Science and Market behavior. The distinctions lie at the very root of his idea of reflexivity. So I don't know what you mean by 'a quantifiable scientific approach to innovation in society'. This sounds like something that both Popper, were he alive, and Soros would say is impossible.
lets stop talking about soros as if he some special thinker. Soros is a banker spokesmodel... he is no popper and we should care less about his approach. as far as being scientific... he is so full of shit he says that he back tells him when to make trades.
Leaked Soros Document Calls For Regulating Internet To Favor ‘Open Society’ Supporters An internal proposed strategy from George Soros’s Open Society Justice Initiative calls for international regulation of private actors’ decisions on “what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain.” Those regulations, the document notes, should favor “those most supportive of open society.” The Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI) is part of the Open Society Foundations, Soros’s secretive network of political organizations. According to the organization’s website, “The Open Society Justice Initiative uses law to protect and empower people around the world, supporting the values and work of the Open Society Foundations.” [dcquiz] The call for international control of the internet is part of a 34-page document titled “2014 Proposed strategy” that lays out OSJI’s goals for between 2014 and 2017. The leaked document was one of 2,500 documents released by “hacktivist” group DCLeaks. As reported by The Daily Caller, the section of DCLeaks’ website dealing with Soros has since gone offline for unknown reasons. TheDC saved a version of the 2014 strategy before the site went offline. (RELATED: If You Only Read The New York Times And Washington Post You Have No Idea The Soros Leak Happened) In the document, OSJI argues that international regulation of the Internet is needed to protect freedom of expression. “Our freedom of expression work furthers the free exchange of information and ideas via the media and internet, and proposes to begin to address the free expression and association rights of NGOs. The internet has been a key tool for promoting freedom of expression and open societies — as in the Arab Spring — and is a potential safeguard against monopoly control of information in such places as China and Central Asia,” page 19 of the document notes. “But it is also presenting underaddressed challenges, including lack of regulation of private operators that are able to decide, without due process procedures, what information is taken off the Internet and what may remain. A ‘race to the bottom’ results from the agendas of undemocratic governments that seek to impose their hostility to free speech on the general online environment. We seek to ensure that, from among the norms emerging in different parts of the world, those most supportive of open society gain sway.” Open Society Justice Initiative Proposed 2014 Strategy/DCLeaks One of the “Program concepts and initiatives” listed in the document is to “Promote — by advocating for the adoption of nuanced legal norms, and litigation — an appropriate balance between privacy and free expression/transparency values in areas of particular interest to OSF and the Justice Initiative, including online public interest speech, access to ethnic data, public health statistics, corporate beneficial ownership, asset declarations of public officials, and rights of NGOs to keep information private.” Another initiative is to “Establish states’ responsibility to collect data necessary to reveal patterns of inequality, and define modes of collection that are effective and protect privacy.” (RELATED: UN Internet Agenda Tied To George Soros) Throughout the document, OSJI’s position appears to be that private actors on the internet must be brought under international control in order to prevent them from suppressing each other’s freedom of expression and speech. One of the organization’s goals is to “Establish soft law and judicial precedents safeguarding online free expression, including adequate protection against blocking of online content, intermediary liability, user standing, and related issues.” (RELATED: FCC Cites Soros-Funded Neo-Marxist-Founded Group 46 TIMES In New Regs) “One weakness of current efforts to promote online free expression has been the relatively sparse and uneven use of the international human rights law framework, including protections for free speech. This may be due to the paucity of coordinated efforts to generate hard law, and some soft law, in this area, both domestically and internationally,” the document states later, before noting the opportunity for the organization to influence “international free speech law in the online environment.” “One reason for this failure may be that the leading digital rights groups/movements have developed separately and at a certain distance from the traditional free speech groups (though this is beginning to change). The Justice Initiative, working with other OSF programs that fund leading players in both sub-fields, is well placed to help bridge that gap and promote the use and development of international free speech law in the online environment.” The U.S. is set to cede control of the internet on Sept. 30, stoking fears that the internet could eventually be subject to the United Nations instead. OSF previously called DCLeaks’s release of the documents “a symptom of an aggressive assault on civil society and human rights activists that is taking place globally.” Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/29/l...-favor-open-society-supporters/#ixzz4IjTw0qLi