Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wildchild, Oct 24, 2017.

  1. Above.

    You said Sarah Sanders is hot!!

    Go back and read what you wrote.
     
    #11     Oct 24, 2017
  2. UsualName

    UsualName

    Fake News!
    I went back and read what I wrote, it said Tom B is a moron.
     
    #12     Oct 24, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  3. Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias “vigorously” denied his involvement in the anti-Trump dossier that has made up the substance of the Russian collusion allegations, New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said.

    Elias’ denial appears to have been intentionally misleading in light of new reporting from The Washington Post that Elias hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Elias reportedly hired Fusion to dig up dirt on Trump as part of a project that became the Trump dossier. (RELATED: Clinton Campaign And DNC Funded Trump Dossier)

    “When I tried to report this story,” Vogel said of the Post report, “Clinton campaign lawyer [Marc Elias] pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.'”

    Another NYT reporter, Maggie Haberman, similarly accused Democrats of sanctimoniously lying about their funding of the Trump dossier.

    “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,” Haberman wrote on Twitter, linking to the Post’s report.

    The Clinton campaign and the DNC reportedly took over funding Fusion GPS in April 2016. A still-unknown Republican donor initially began funding the opposition research firm’s investigation of Trump up until that point. (RELATED: The Search For Fusion GPS’ Mysterious Republican Client)
     
    #13     Oct 24, 2017
  4. UsualName

    UsualName

    Now you’re trusting New York Times reporters too?

    Sarah Sanders would be very disappointed.
     
    #14     Oct 24, 2017
  5. Racist or jealous or both ?
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    #15     Oct 24, 2017
  6. Tom B

    Tom B

    Lol triggered.
     
    #16     Oct 24, 2017
  7. wildchild

    wildchild

    The lefties were ready to pan it because it was from Fox News or Brietbart, then they found out it was from the Washington Compost and they didnt have shit to say. Its kind of hard when it comes from one of the left wing gospels.
     
    #17     Oct 24, 2017
    ThunderThor likes this.
  8. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

     
    #18     Oct 24, 2017
  9. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

     
    #19     Oct 24, 2017
    ThunderThor likes this.
  10. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    So to summarize:

    • Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid to uncover and package dirt, whether factual or not, on Trump which eventually found its way in the Trump dossier
    • In doing so, the Clintons and the DNC were effectively collaborating with "deep" sources, both among the UK spy apparatus and inside Russia
    • Once Trump won, the FBI was instrumental in "leaking" the dossier to the mainstream media and select still unknown recipients (the same way Comey "leaked" his personal notebooks just a few months later, following his termination, to launch a probe of Trump).
    • The former head of the FBI who was supposed to probe Clinton's State Department - and the Clinton Foundation - for a bribery and kickback scheme involving Russia’s U.S. nuclear business, is now investigating Trump for Russia collusion instead
    _____________________________________

    Which in light of the latest news suggests that Clinton was lying, which is not surprising, especially when considering the recent "revelations" that the Clintons may themselves have been involved in collusion with Russia over the infamous uranium deal.

    Which brings us to the questionable role played by the FBI in all of this, and ultimately, the role still being played by Robert Mueller. Here is the WSJ,

    Ah yes, the Clinton's own Russia collusion narrative which recently emerged to the surface and which as of today is being investigated by the House:

    As the WSJ correctly notes, "for anyone who cares to look, the real problem here is that the FBI itself is so thoroughly implicated in the Russia meddling story."

    Which then shifts the focus to the person who was, and again is, in charge of it all: former FBI director, and current special prosecutor Robert Mueller:

    The punchline: it's not the Clintons that should be looked at, at least not at first - their time will come. It's the FBI:

    We eagerly look forward to Trump's furious tweetstorm once he learns of all of this... and how long before he fires Mueller, in this case with cause.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-24/wapo-dnc-clinton-campaign-financed-infamous-trump-dossier
     
    #20     Oct 24, 2017