Climate models have performed quite well..

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Feb 23, 2014.

  1. Arnie

    Arnie

    "An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5°K."


    Well damn! You mean all we have to do is increase SO2 emissions and we can solve this "warming" problem? :D
     
    #21     Feb 24, 2014
  2. jem

    jem

    emprical proof. what? a distorted perspective charts which actually shows co2 trails warming and cooling if it has correct data?
    we have the data in the humlum paper on the other thread... the data shows co2 trails change in ocean temps.

     
    #22     Feb 24, 2014

  3. Did you say something liar? Can't see your words. But yes, there is no doubt that CO2 is greenhouse gas.

    Maybe you are interested in what these guys think (that's a joke). They should know about geophysical processes.


    American Geophysical Union

    "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
     
    #23     Feb 24, 2014
  4. ==============
    Future C;
    Thanks for the ''non hockey stick '' charts. I study trends a lot.....

    Sincerely, murray t t urtle

    PS= BIG problem with those charts, and almost all charts of [global warming/climate change]of the small sample charts is they're ''small sample time'';'' small sample in change.'' Another big problem is when somewhat brainy scientist, they dont know the big, big,BIG, difference between a small sample + a trend..

    Not a prediction,LOL:D
     
    #24     Feb 24, 2014
  5. Actually, yes. One thing being considered is a geo-engineering project to do just that. It would involve a few jets flying around and distributing SO2 . Would only cost a billion or two per year.

    However, there are problems with the idea. One big one is that it does nothing to reduce acidification of the oceans. Another is that is messing around with the earth's climate and the consequences could be bad. But of course, we are already doing that.
     
    #25     Feb 24, 2014


  6. You're welcome.
    Here's a longer term look at temps.


    [​IMG]

    http://www.newscientist.com/article...hockey-stick-graph-has-been-proven-wrong.html
     
    #26     Feb 24, 2014
  7. jem

    jem

    [​IMG]
     
    #27     Feb 24, 2014
    murray t turtle likes this.
  8. jem

    jem

    [​IMG]
     
    #28     Feb 24, 2014
  9. jem

    jem

    Prediction is on target so far. FC just posted some illogical insults instead of posting science or 5 of these thousands or papers which are supposed to say man made co2 is causing warming.



     
    #29     Feb 24, 2014
  10. #30     Feb 24, 2014