Climate Change

I find solace in the fact that more and more of the public is catching on to the AGW scam.

These same idiots will be rambling about AGC (anthropogenic global cooling) by the end of Solar Cycle 26 as we approach another Grand Solar Minimum. Let's hope it similar to the Dalton Minimum and not as bad as the Maunder Minimum.

The earth warms and cools based on fluctuations in solar irradiance. What a crazy theory! I can't believe how many nutty scientific papers I've read on the subject, where solar activity strongly correlates to temperature changes. Don't get me wrong; there's one paper by a couple of whackjobs that's held up by the IPCC as proof that fluctuations in solar activity have near zero effect on the earth's temperature. And it's probably even been 'peer' reviewed.

 

But NASA is NOT saying that the earth has stopped gaining heat. Not at all. They know as well as the rest of the climate science community that the earth continues to gain heat without pause. The chart I posted proves that, and your contention that it is outdated is absurd. Check the date.

You are confusing air temps with the earth's heat content. Not the same thing at all. What matters in the long term is the heat content.

 

And without CO2 it would be at least thirty degrees colder. Know why?

 

Actually the public doesn't really give a damn.

 

You are one stupid dumb ass.

NASA is one the four most authoritative sources of climate information in the world.

NASA's scientific conclusions:

1. GLOBAL WARMING HAS SLOWED
2. IT IS A MYSTERY TO NASA WITH RESPECT TO WHY IT HAS SLOWED
3. TEMP IN TOP HALF OF WORLD'S OCEANS ARE NOT CLIMBING FAST ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR STALLED AIR TEMPS
4. WARMING IN DEEP OCEAN IS NOT CAUSING SEA LEVEL RISE
5. WATER TEMP IN DEEP OCEAN HASN'T RISEN SINCE 2005
6. AIR TEMPERATURES HAVE STALLED

http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/octo...th-s-ocean-abyss-has-not-warmed/#.VDRWT_mzElq

If you are not in total agreement with every single statement above, you have a problem with one the four most authoritative sources of climate information in the world.

futurecurrents said:

You are clearly refusing to believe NASA science even though it is right there. You are demonstrating that your religious beliefs are so strong that you refuse to accept scientific conclusions from NASA itself.

Fraud,

Are you a cherry picker?

You look like a cherry picker.

NOW GO PICK ME SOME CHERRIES!

I am hungry.

 

...

 

We already did this dance you dumb ass. You concluded that NASA was wrong.

 

I am starting to think that futurecurrents is not just one person but many people. The only other conclusions are that you really are that fucking stupid or you literally have amnesia.

 

So do you agree that air temps have stalled?

 

BTW - I am not confusing anything. I am simply posting NASA's scientific conclusions.