Here's another look. Best current science. Unlikely to change much. The hockey stick is a fact. Ten of the hemispheric temperature reconstructions published by December 2005, four were omitted because they had been superseded by later reconstructions or due to data plotting issues.
Don't have to. The pros have done it already. And hadcrut is a just one very limited data set. Sorry, I'm not a nutcase like you. I for one trust that NASA and NOAA are going to have the best science. And we are talking the last thousand, not your favorite cherry picked 18 years. Do try to keep up.
So basically you admit you're incompetent and are unable to do your own work. BTW - HadCRUT4 is the MOST complete global temperature data set.
Read my lips moron......we are talking last thousand. How far back does hadcrut go? Like talking to a ten year old. A moronic, right wing ten year old
You are claiming that NASA and NOAA have measured temperatures for the past 1000 years, eh? You do realize the U.S. Federal government only came into existence in the late 1700s. HadCRUT measured data goes back to 1856. Go plot it and learn.
Right, and we are talking about the last ten years being the warmest in the last thousand years. It is MULTIPLE warm years that leads to tick population growth. Get it yet? Many warm years in a row. Warmest on instrumental record. Warmest on non instrumental record. Ticks like warm. Thus there are probably more ticks than there has been in the last thousand years. If you still cannot understand this just shoot yourself in the head. You are not using it anyway.
Terrifying Flat Global Temperature Crisis Threatens To Disrupt U.N. Climate Conference Agenda http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...ens-to-disrupt-u-n-climate-conference-agenda/
Let's take a look at how the Climate Alarmists operate... Heat is on the Weather Bureau after MP accuses it of wiping 118-year-old temperature records to justify claims of climate change http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...re-records-justify-claims-climate-change.html An MP will launch an inquiry which accuses the Bureau of Meteorology of manipulating figures on the impact of climate change. George Christensen, member off the Nationals party, claimed the Bureau had 'fudged' records of rising temperatures as well as tampering with older data in order to justify claims of climate change. The member for the seat of Dawson in Queensland used records from a drought in 1896, when temperatures reached 50C in Camden, south-west of Sydney, as well as 43C in Geelong, south-west of Melbourne. Speaking in parliament on Wednesday, Mr Christensen said: 'I rise to paint a picture of Camden. A picture where Camden, just to the south-west of Sydney, is sweltering in 50C heat.' He cited that in the summer of 1896 alone, there were 435 instances of heat related deaths. 'The Bureau of Meteorology claims it's getting hotter and hotter. How can last year be the hottest on record if it was hotter back in 1896, 118 years ago?' 'It's relatively simple: the early years are simply wiped from the official record.' Mr Christensen claimed you can find the values he is referring to on the Bureau website, but they are not part of the official temperature record the bureau uses to report on climate change issues. He said the Bureau was also involved in a process of tampering with the raw data so the past appeared cooler than the present. 'Obviously if you drop down temperatures from the past, all the later temperatures will appear warmer even if they are not,' he said. 'We cannot use fudged figures skewed to support a global warming hypothesis. We have a scientific process being tainted at the source.' Mr Christensen said he would use evidence of the Bureau's misconduct to launch an inquiry this week. (More at url)