Climate Change

Discussion in 'Politics' started by dbphoenix, Sep 26, 2014.


  1. I'll say it again. If you think that AGW is a fantasy you are an idiot. A moron. An ignorant deluded dolt. Period.
     
    #291     Oct 15, 2014
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I'll say it again. You're a dick sucking ignorant dumb ass heat & air installer who knows noting about climate change.
     
    #292     Oct 15, 2014
  3. Speaking of morons, idiots and dolts. Lucrum takes top spot.
     
    #293     Oct 15, 2014
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Even when I'm on your ignore list, for the 4th time now?
    LOL
     
    #294     Oct 15, 2014
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I make a living analyzing large scientific data sets to drive decisioning & other analytics for banks and other organizations. I am probably the only person in this forum who has dug through the raw temperature data from HadCRUT and other sources. The bottom line - the global temperature is not rising over the past two decades and it has no correlation to CO2 level. I will also note that many processed temperature sets completely fail basic fraud analysis.

    The bottom line is that politically-driven "science" that starts as a fraud - still remains a fraud no matter how much additional government funded "scientific thought" is added to it over a 40 year timespan.
     
    #295     Oct 15, 2014
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum


    Game Set Match!
     
    #296     Oct 15, 2014
  7. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    And so many disagree with you. That too is the nature of scientific debate and enquiry. If you make a living analyzing large scientific data sets, I hope that you have more than an adolescent mindset when doing so.
     
    #297     Oct 15, 2014
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I go where the data leads... not where the politics tell me to go.

    I suppose next FC is going to pop up with some absurd comment about 97% disagreeing with me - which is just an absurd example of politics over realistic science. There is no "97%" scientific consensus regarding AGW.
     
    #298     Oct 15, 2014
  9. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Given the language you use to describe your enquiry, it would appear instead that you approach the data with substantial prejudice.

    Whether you do or not, though, has no effect on the outcome.
     
    #299     Oct 15, 2014
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    You mean the outcome that the earth has not warmed for over 18 years defying all the fear inducing models.

    Yes, the AGW reality is not standing up to the politically-driven fear mongering.

    Let's walk through the AGW name changes over time as the reality of no warming and no wholesale climate change hit home.
    Global Warming -> Climate Change -> Climate Disruption

    The movement is now reduced to trying to blame every storm and tornado on "Climate Disruption".
     
    #300     Oct 15, 2014