Fraud, Why do you deny information from the very sources that you quote all the time such as the IPCC, APS and NASA?
1. first of all, upon putting a bit of thought into this... your chart must be quite stale.. because if the 11 year average was on recent data it would be flat or down... so it is deceptive to use it and not disclaim that issue. cherry picked would be a nice word... misrepresentation is another. (that is unless 2014 data changes things... because I have only seen one chart which includes 2014.) 2. No... you know damn well I spoke about using the 11 year moving average of land - ocean temps. which is a very long moving average when your baseline is the 35 years of solar decline and inside the data we see 19 years of flat land ocean temps and recent decline in land temps. i
Years ago, not long after Hansen made his splash, a group of National Academy members published a graph showing strong correlation between solar activity and what is now called the temperature anomaly. I'm glad to see this more recent paper has followed up on what seems like an obvious connection that one expects should be there -- keeping in mind that correlation does not prove cause. This seems to be very nice work by Douglass and Knox published in the highly regarded Physics Letters. Thank you Jem, for turning this up. (Interestingly, if I recall correctly, I think that long-ago graph of solar activity versus temperature was circulated in a letter, before Hansen himself was invited to become a member of the Academy sometime in the late 1990s.)
thanks, but it was not great effort... lets give the most viewed climate website in the world the credit.
Hey dipshit CO2 levels have fluctuated wildly long before humans ever burned fossil fuels for energy. Look it up you ignorant fuck And yes humans are only responsible for three percent of CO2 emissions!!!!!! Look it up!!!!!!