that is the question. all the other faux science nutters... here... show us your links right now... why not answer this question...
OK, this is it, the science. I'm posting this for once and for all. Here's the link. Now you idiot deniers can shut the fuck up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
So FC are you unable to answer the question. Let's try it again... So FC if the level of a GHG increases in the atmosphere - according to scientific studies does a) the temperature go up. b) the temperature go down. c) the temperature can go either up or down depending on a host of other factors. Please give us your answer.
I'll answer after you and jerm tell us why you think that CO2 is not a GHG. Or tell us why the earth is getting warmer.
Climate change denial is a set of organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons. Typically, these attempts take the rhetorical form of legitimate scientific debate, while not adhering to the actual principles of that debate. Climate change denial has been associated with the energy lobby, industry advocates and free market think tanks, often in the United States. Some commentators describe climate change denial as a particular form of denialism. Peter Christoff, writing in The Age (2007), said that climate change denial differs from skepticism, which is essential for good science. He went on to say that "almost two decades after the issue became one of global concern, the 'big' debate over climate change is over. There are now no credible scientific skeptics challenging the underlying scientific theory, or the broad projections, of climate change." The relationships between industry-funded denial and public climate change skepticism have at times been compared to earlier efforts by the tobacco industry to undermine what is now widely accepted scientific evidence relating to the dangers of secondhand smoke, or even linked as a direct continuation of these earlier financial relationships. Aside from private industry groups, climate change denial has also been alleged regarding the statements of elected officials. Between 2002 and 2010, conservative billionaires donated nearly $120m to more than 100 anti-climate groups casting doubt on the science behind climate change.