1. the moving average in your graph stu... stops short, very suspiciously. (it sure seems like it was about to start moving down.) 2. the source? the source may have included the data... but it does not look like your chart does. my reference is the last big hump on your chart is 1998... there are not nearly as many up and downs after that as there should be... even after making the allowance for more compression. so stop stop being a lying ass twit the chart is lacking detail about the year it stops and the moving averages stops instead of dipping down. its misleading bullshit... like you. here is a real chart of the recent temps for your comparison.
Only a right wing idiot would think such a short term chart is at all relevant. THIS is the relevant chart.
Here's another relevant chart. If one can look at this and still say AGW is a hoax or not true....they must be a right wing retard. Or just a retard.
The argument will retreat to "natural variability". Of course, the world would then be "naturally" warming. But don't lose sight of the final argument, "ok, the world is warming. Ok, it's CO2 doing it. Ok, Man is partially or largely responsible for that CO2. But it will simply be more food for plants!"
It's interesting. It shows how well propaganda works on the righty brain. One reason is because the righty brain is so easily deluded. The ignorance and intellectual weakness makes them very good sheep.
I'll be blunt, and apologies in advance, but I think half (at least) of the arguing over climate here is only about getting you going.