Climate Change... its the sun... again.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Jan 12, 2015.

  1. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

  2. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    [​IMG]
     
    #132     Jan 15, 2015
  3. stu

    stu

    Look at the chart then. The 11 year Moving Average after 2000 is flat and the data source includes 2014 if you'd cared to check!
    You're suggesting a 100 year period chart is only valid if it contains 2014 data (which it does anyway).
    Really?:rolleyes:

    It's a long moving average over a long period of 100 years to date based on hard NASA data. You telling me you don't understand what moving average is?

    Whereas your chart is a short period of 25 years using short 3 year periods overlay, with something being called a Low frequency index aSST3.4, and with that, there is still only an assertion being made that solar activity is a 'climate pacemaker'.

    Comparing the two, it's quite evident what you've posted is the cherry picker.
     
    #133     Jan 16, 2015
  4. Max E.

    Max E.


    Yeah, the numbers dont make any sense, we are responsible for 3 percent of CO2 emissions and CO2 only makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere, so even if we cut our emissions to zero, that would knock the 0.04% number down by 3%, So instead of being 0.04% it would then make up 0.0397% of the atmosphere, LOL

    And that is if we disappear completely, these morons are on a mission to against a number that is infinitesimally small in the grand scheme of things.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2015
    #134     Jan 16, 2015
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Sadly, the climate alarmists can't do basic math.
     
    #135     Jan 16, 2015

  6. But those numbers are irrelevant, the key thing is that we have raised atmospheric levels by 40%. CO2 is responsible is for around half of earth's greenhouse effect, without which the earth would be around fifty degrees colder.

    It's really very simple. A ten year old can understand it. But not a righty. Proving, once again that righties are dumber than ten year olds.

    In fact the denial of AGW is one of the best proofs of just how stupid conservatives are.
     
    #136     Jan 16, 2015
  7. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Not all of them. Look at the bunkers that the rich are building to wait it all out when the time comes and all the plebes die.

    2012, man, 2012.
     
    #137     Jan 16, 2015
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    According to futurecurrents - numbers and math is irrelevant.

    [​IMG]
     
    #138     Jan 16, 2015

  9. What are you, twelve?
     
    #139     Jan 16, 2015
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Amazing.... you can count higher than 10.

    Seeing that you continually push your global warming religion which is based on faith and not science...

    [​IMG]
     
    #140     Jan 16, 2015