TEMP IN TOP HALF OF WORLD'S OCEANS ARE NOT CLIMBING FAST ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR STALLED AIR TEMPS IPCC said in Section D.1 of the AR5 WG1 SPM: Bold and underline mine. To paraphrase the quote below - We don't fucking know. To which the American Physical Society reasonably asked: To which Fraudcurrents will most likely reply something like 97% blablahblah.
Paraphrased in regular people talk. Hey, IPCC, you are making up all kinds of shit to account for the pause in global surface temperatures. You can't even fucking back up any of your bullshit with math. Do you have any fucking idea what has caused global surface temps to pause?
Yeah. And while they're at it they should explain why rising global surface temps paused in the '50s.
This is literally like playing checkers with a 2 year old. You want me to respond in one of two ways: The first way is "yes" CO2 is a GHG. In which you will probably reply something like; you righty moron CO2 is going up and is a GHG therefore there is global warming even a fucking 10 year old can get it. The other way you want me to respond is "no" CO2 is not a GHG. In which you will probably reply something like - You don't even know what a GHG is? That is science 101. Righty moron. I even made an attempt to replicate your gibberish.
just in case people are scanning through this.. its like putting an IPCC writer on the stand and using his/her own writing to show he has no credibility. and of course your kicker was awesome. in other words if the sun and the tides and other things can cause a stall... can't they cause the warming or cooling too? If non-anthropogenic influences are strong enough to counteract the expected effects of increased CO2, why wouldn’t they be strong enough to sometimes enhance warming trends, and in so doing lead to an over-estimate of CO2 influence? What are the implications of this stasis for confidence in the models and their projections?