Yes, we must practice the science of taxing people into poverty, the science of ignoring all the pollution and emissions belched out by China, India, Russia and every other developing country, the science of pretending that America alone is the primary diver of climate change, and the science of completely ignoring all of the climate shifts which happened prior to evil Americans driving their gas guzzling vehicles. IOW, political science is the only science we must practice.
somebody call Elon, we're going to need bigger rockets: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...ies-can-change-earth-or-moons-orbits-to-fight Gohmert asks if federal agencies can change Earth's or moon's orbits to fight climate change
Just a matter of time before Trumpers do this ↑. Just like they did that ↓. https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...e-did-take-bleach-to-protect-from-coronavirus
what's being driven by agenda OP? https://www.rawstory.com/exxonmobil-controls-11-senators/ ExxonMobil lobbyist 'deeply embarrassed' after he accidentally reveals 11 senators he says he relies on to push Big Oil's agenda "Did we aggressively fight against some of the science? Yes. Did we hide our science? Absolutely not," said McCoy on camera. "Did we join some of these shadow groups to work against some of the early efforts? Yes, that's true. But there's nothing, there's nothing illegal about that. We were looking out for our investments. We were looking out for our shareholders." McCoy compared his work with elected officials to fishing with ExxonMobil who supplies the "bait" before it "reels in" the official on issues like a carbon tax, electric cars, taxation and infrastructure. "When you have an opportunity to talk to a member of Congress, I liken it to fishing, right? You know you have bait, you throw that bait out. And they say: 'Oh, you want to talk about infrastructure, yeah,'" McCoy continued. "And then you start to reel them in and you start to have these conversations about federal leasing programs, you start to have these conversations about a carbon tax. You know, it's all these opportunities that you use and to use the fishing analogy again just to kind of reel them in." "I make sure I get them the right information that they need so they look good. And then they help me out. They're a captive audience. They know they need you. And I need them," McCoy also said. He went on to explain that lobbyists aim to have close relationships with officials. "You want to be able to go to the chief… and say we need congressman so and so to be able to either introduce this bill, we need him to make a floor statement, we need him to send a letter. You name it, we've asked for everything," he said. McCoy said he has 11 U.S. senators who are "crucial" in ExxonMobil's efforts. "Senator Shelley Moore Capito, Senator Joe Manchin, Senator Kyrsten Sinema, Senator Jon Tester, Senator Maggie Hassan, Senator John Barrasso, Senator John Cornyn, Senator Steve Daines, Senator Chris Coons, Senator Mark Kelly and Senator Marco Rubio," were all cited. He went on to explain that the last thing they want is to appear in a public hearing before Congress where the American people can see. "We don't want it to be us, to have these conversations, especially in a hearing. It's getting our associations to step in and have those conversations and answer those tough questions and be for, the lack of a better term, the whipping boy for some of these members of congress," McCoy confessed. "There was something we were working on earlier this week where we, where our CEO was invited to a hearing from a member of congress who we know is just going to rip him to shreds when he goes there. So, we look at it and we say: well, why us?" he asked. In a statement, McCoy said he was "deeply embarrassed" by his caught-on-camera comments. "My statements clearly do not represent ExxonMobil's positions on important public policy issues. While some of my comments were taken out of context, there is no excuse for what I said or how I said it."