https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/25/us/politics/igor-danchenko-steele-dossier.html WASHINGTON — Not long after the early 2017 publication of a notorious dossier about President Trump jolted Washington, an expert in Russian politics told the F.B.I. he had been one of its key sources, drawing on his contacts to deliver information that would make up some of the most salacious and unproven assertions in the document. The F.B.I. had approached the expert, a man named Igor Danchenko, as it vetted the dossier’s claims. He agreed to tell investigators what he knew with an important condition, people familiar with the matter said — that the F.B.I. keep his identity secret so he could protect himself, his sources and his family and friends in Russia. But his hope of remaining anonymous evaporated last week after Attorney General William P. Barr directed the F.B.I. to declassify a redacted report about its three-day interview of Mr. Danchenko in 2017 and hand it over to Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Mr. Graham promptly made the interview summary public while calling the entire Russia investigation “corrupt.” The report blacked out Mr. Danchenko’s name and other identifying information. But within two days, a post on a newly created blog entitled “I Found the Primary Subsource” identified him, citing clues left visible in the F.B.I. document. A pseudonymous Twitter account created in May then promoted the existence of the blog. And the next day, RT, the Kremlin-owned, English-language news and propaganda outlet, published an article amplifying Mr. Danchenko’s identification. The decision by Justice Department and F.B.I. leaders to divulge such a report was highly unusual and created the risk it would help identify a person who had confidentially provided information to agents, even if officials did not intend to provide such a road map. The move comes at a time when Mr. Barr, who is to testify before lawmakers on Tuesday, has repeatedly been accused of abusing his powers to help Mr. Trump politically. Former law enforcement officials said the outing will make it harder for F.B.I. agents to gain the trust of people they need to cooperate in future and unrelated investigations. “These things have to remain very closely held because you put witnesses at risk,” said James W. McJunkin, a former F.B.I. assistant director for counterterrorism. “To release sensitive information unnecessarily that could jeopardize someone’s life is egregious.” In addition to their political implications, the documents have at times revealed the closely held secrets that Mr. Wray feared jeopardizing: sources of information and the methods used for gathering it. Transcripts of recordings released in April resulted in the identification of a confidential F.B.I. informant who had agree to wear a wire when talking to George Papadopoulos, a former Trump adviser who was convicted of lying to the F.B.I. Other released transcripts of a Russian diplomat’s conversations with former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn revealed that the bureau was able to monitor the phone line of the Russian Embassy in Washington even before a call connected with Mr. Flynn’s voice mail. The unmaskings from the release of the F.B.I. report have already spiraled beyond Mr. Danchenko. Building on the knowledge of his identity, another Twitter user named a likely source for Mr. Danchenko. Online sleuths were trying to identify others from his network who were cited but not named in the Steele dossier. The release of Mr. Danchenko’s interview summary likely put him and other sources in Russia’s sights, said Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. “Under Attorney General Barr, the levers of the Department of Justice continue to be weaponized in defense of the president’s political agenda, even at the expense of national security,” said Mr. Warner, who did not confirm that Mr. Danchenko was Mr. Steele’s primary source or discuss his committee’s own investigation into Russian election interference. “I’m deeply concerned by this release. There is no doubt that the Russians are poring over it to see if they can identify this individual or other sources. Mr. Danchenko also cooperated with the intelligence committee on condition of confidentiality, according to two people familiar with its investigation.
Well now, that's just too bad for Mr. Danchenko isn't it? He played weasel games with a corrupt FBI under Comey and now he has been outed. An informer should be protected to the extent possible but when his information is used as a basis for setting an investigation into motion that has the goal of finding criminal charges against Trump and overthrowing a lawfully elected president, then Mr. Trump and the people are entitled to examine the witnesses against him. Ruskie Boy is not even remotely the last one to be outed in this process. Christopher Wray has even tried to protect the identities of FBI agents that participated in corrupt practices. And of course, like Ruskie Boy, Wray argues that their identities need to be protected. How convenient. Barr has outed some of them too. The outing of weasels is jusssssssssssssssst beginning. Thank you again for your service to the country Mr. Barr. MORE TO COME.
The way that the FBI is supposed to handle such situations is to take the informants information/tips and use it to develop their own corroboration of what has gone on, and then use that as the basis for getting warrants, launching investigations, etc. and leave the original informant protected. But they were unable to come up with other corroboration and then proceeded on Ruskie Boy's allegation alone which left him as the person who needs to be confronted at trial whether criminal, impeachment, or legislative inquiry. Tough Tuna, Ruskie Boy. You lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas as the Indian saying goes.
A lefty outrage congressional cow asks Barr about the removal of the mob in DC across from the White House: Question: Mr. Barr are you aware that the pastors of both of those churches have publicly condemned your actions? Answer by Mr. Barr: Did they say that before or after we put the fire out?
Just in time for election season too, what's that, no red governors in this probe you say?: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/depa...ates-issued-covid-19-orders-may-have-resulted Department of Justice Requesting Data From Governors of States that Issued COVID-19 Orders that May Have Resulted in Deaths of Elderly Nursing Home Residents Data will help inform whether the Department of Justice will initiate investigations under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) regarding New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Michigan’s response to COVID-19 in public nursing homes
No one killed the elderly quite like Cuomo. If Biden is elected, the investigations will immediately end.