CL Redux

Discussion in 'Journals' started by schizo, Oct 9, 2009.

  1. ammo

    ammo

    using 10 yr for a larger timefram, we are working that 115-82 bellcurve,95-96 nip is broken for supp to work upper portion, so in theory we work our way back to 82-83, that 93 is a tl supp starting with june lows in 2012
     
    #34371     Jan 6, 2014
  2. ammo

    ammo

    on a 9 mo that 93 area had the most volume over the timeperiod and is currently debating whether or not it's still a valid value area and its a trendline
     
    #34372     Jan 6, 2014
  3. Thanks for the perspective ammo!
     
    #34373     Jan 6, 2014
  4. Visaria

    Visaria

    :D

    Happy New Yr, ND, how's it going so far?
     
    #34374     Jan 6, 2014
  5. NoDoji

    NoDoji

    I'm liking the trend days!

    Also, curious about how this 93.00 key level will play out. If I was a gambling swinger I'd be long LOL!
     
    #34375     Jan 6, 2014
  6. Is the Nodoji inventory retrace rule in effect today?
     
    #34376     Jan 8, 2014
  7. NoDoji

    NoDoji

    LMAO, I was just having that very thought. I think there are way too many eyes on the 93.00 zone. We need a really good breakout downside to wash out all the "key support level" speculators first :D

    (BTW, that's not my rule. I believe it's a CFTC rule.)
     
    #34377     Jan 8, 2014
  8. ammo

    ammo

    after breaking the 93 60-90 nip , its stair stepping down those ledge supports
     
    #34378     Jan 8, 2014
  9. I'm hoping if we do get to 91 the IV index will be firmly in the low to mid 20's and then I'll have something to play with. Until then I'm trapped in this day trading hell. How do you people find this enjoyable? I should have just kept those 95 puts on for another :mad:
     
    #34379     Jan 8, 2014
  10. Visaria

    Visaria

    first cl trade of the year: bot a small position at 92.83 feb. Don't have much faith in it, but possible it might bounce back to 95 ish. i'll give it about a dollar risk.
     
    #34380     Jan 12, 2014