jfranco, are you trading a different contract? Your prices posted don't match the price at the time of the posts. Maybe my time is off here.
No Doji, why don't you show your trade record with time and sales? You are calling out others for times and trades not matching. The longer I see this CL redux and "real Time" trades.. the more I realize tht most people here really don't actually trade. Anyway .. just my 2 cents and here is my most recent Qm trade.. silly lil one.. still short 850 uco at 57.43 I say if you do a trade why not show the time and sales with it.. big deal.. the trade has already been done... BOT 1 QM APR11 Futures 105.475 USD NYMEX 09:16:23 2.07 SLD 1 QM APR11 Futures 105.525 USD NYMEX 09:30:08 2.07 20.86
TZ, if people are calling real time trades, showing T&S is irrelevant. If someone posts the trade below at 11:35am ET and that entire price bar is 105.42 down to 104.88, I'm just curious if they're trading something different or posting way after the fact (in which case T&S would help all those .10 winners look more realistic).
I think he is trying to create a false record to sell something, I had to delete some of his other threads, but gave him his own thread to post his trades in if he wants to continue.
lol... trying to create a track record to sell something..my trades have been crap since i started posting.. lol... oh well. goodluck to those of you who actually trade.. oil down over a dollar today..i.e. negative a buck ./.i.e. below 104 on the close today
All right, whose damn job was it to post the memo to short ES off the open and take the rest of the day off?
TZ, we're referring to jfranco, not you. Posting trades can be distracting. You should just focus on trading this monster unless you're trading for longer holds than just these little back and forth swings, IMHO.
While the opposition has managed to fight off onslaughts by Gadhafi's forces in some places -- including what a witness described as an "amazing" victory against Gadhafi's heavy artillery Sunday in the town of Misrata -- the regime has advanced as well. U.K. Foreign Secretary William Hague said Monday "there are credible reports of the use of helicopter gunships against civilians by government forces." UN ----------- Three members of the U.N. Security Council -- France, Britain, and the United States -- were working Monday on a possible resolution that would include language on a no-fly zone over Libya, diplomatic sources at the United Nations said. But any kind of military intervention could face sharp criticism from Russia and China, two fellow permanent members of the council that wield veto power. US Govt. ------------ U.S. President Barack Obama said Monday he had a "very clear message to those who are around Col. Gadhafi: It is their choice to make how they operate moving forward and they will be held accountable for whatever violence continues to take place there." "We've got NATO as we speak consulting in Brussels around a wide range of potential options, including potential military options, in response to the violence that continues to take place inside Libya," he said. NATO --------- In a statement, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said NATO did not intend to intervene in Libya, but "as a defence Alliance and a security organization, it is our job to conduct prudent planning for any eventuality."