City Forced To Lower Police Testing Standards Because Not Enough Blacks Passed

Discussion in 'Politics' started by rc8222, Mar 13, 2011.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    Perhaps I don't know what you mean by "high quality" population. Looking over your other replies, it seems you mean a more racially homogeneous, intelligent population. The homogeneity preventing more social ills, and the intelligence being good for... productivity(?) Is that correct?
     
    #71     Mar 18, 2011
  2. rc8222

    rc8222


    Because that would be considered racist in today's world. Making a minority work hard at anything would be considered cruel and unusual punishment. At least that's what any libertard Democrat would say!!!
     
    #72     Mar 18, 2011
  3. Ricter

    Ricter

    For the same reason I have to have an expanded engineer in training program: I need the labor today. It's not the best, but supervised it's better than nothing. And my need is not nearly on par with law enforcement.

    That article can be read more than one way. On one hand Dayton's need is "desperate". On the other hand the DOJ says "hire more blacks".
     
    #73     Mar 18, 2011
  4. Libturds believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.
     
    #74     Mar 18, 2011
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Which they have no business saying or ordering in the first place.

    Applicants can study more in preparation for the exam or find another career suited to their abilities and or motivation. Fuck all this stupid racial quota political correctness bull shit.

    How many of you bleeding heart libtards would willing get on an airline piloted by pilots who were only hired after the tests standards were lowered?

    How many of would like to get surgery performed by a half ass doctor whose was only hired because of racial quotas?

    How many of you would like to have a completely unqualified POTUS just because...oh wait... we've already done that one.
     
    #75     Mar 18, 2011
  6. Funny how anti-gun libturds think it's OK for unqualified minorities to carry them.
     
    #76     Mar 18, 2011
  7. Much of America's recent immigrant population are (like our permanent underclass) cargo cultists:

    They want "the goods" but they are not able to create, maintain, or live up to the requirements of the advanced civilization/society they find desirable.

    If this is allowed to continue unchecked, this (along with other things) will "arb" away the "American" quality of life that I have, my parents had, grandparents had, etc, that most of "us" have aspired too.

    So long as we invite the third world, they will be thrilled to get welfare benefits, "free" goodies, etc.

    The problem comes when their very nature leads to begin destroying the communities they move to. They kill the golden goose because they have no idea how or why it works.

    A prime example of this (and a good example of "population quality issues) is the Nigeria/Somalia/Haiti refuge scam.

    Most of these "refuges" end up on welfare. They are forming criminal gangs, engage in child prostitution, rape, petty theft, home invasions, etc etc, in places in America that had previously been ideal places to live.

    Places with a very high quality of life, like Minnesota, Maine, etc.

    Of course the MSM covers it up with lies. They hardly cover the crime (including barbaric cultural practices) but they love to make up lies that somali's "revitalize" areas (how a people who are mostly welfare recipients "revitalize" an area is beyond me.)

    If people refuse to face PC square and stand up to it, the future will be bleak. The quality of life all over middle america will go to hell. I believe this is not a side effect, but rather the long term goal of the liberal elite.

    Millions of Haitians, Somali's, etc will/would doom many places in America. White flight will occur, yet what happens where there is no where to "fly" too? Well, the situation will get very ugly.

    Haitians have been a free people ever since they overthrew their French masters hundreds of years ago. What have they done? They are a nation as international welfare recipient and basket case. These people are not able to maintain or create civilization. Any other conclusion is delusional at best.

    If those on the better end of things (by our standards) who enjoy peaceful, tranquil, high standards of living never wake up to the issue of population quality... Well, your children will live in a world vastly worse than what you now have. Simple as that.

    If you are wealthy it will be better but still a changed America. You will need guard dogs, razor wire fence around your house, etc. Perhaps you will never go outside your heavily guarded wealth bubble, as the ultra wealthy do in many/most third world nations.

    It will take time but that is what multiculturalism will bring to us.
     
    #77     Mar 18, 2011
  8. Europeans found out the hard way. But the shit-for-brains libturds in the United States still can't bring themselves to acknowledge reality, even after seeing it across the pond.

    State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12371994

    France's Sarkozy: Multiculturalism Has Failed
    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/February/Frances-Sarkozy-Multiculturalism-Has-Failed/

    Angela Merkel: German multiculturalism has 'utterly failed'
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed
     
    #78     Mar 18, 2011
  9. On one hand I'm an individualist who despises racism as the lowest, most brutish form of collectivism... While on the other hand I'm somehow inclined to agree with this post. :confused: :confused: :confused:
     
    #79     Mar 18, 2011
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    lol
     
    #80     Mar 18, 2011