this in part explains why is vote total was lower than Obama's the low vote surprised me so yes this is monday morning quarterbacking or replaying the market after it closes (for those who trade. j/k ) 1. played rope a dope while Obama's team assinated his character. 2. like mccain refused to go after obama. 3. did not exploit Obama lies about benghazi 4. had been a liberal 5. apparently a tech failure did not get out the vote on election day. 6. former liberal did not seem convincing on this most important issue, taxes and how he would revive the economy. he gave platitudes without plan. 7. romney care 8. stiff 9.47 % 10 non a mainstream religion 11. Obama had the press lie for him and everything else he needed. 12. this is like stiff... but he just did not convey the passion or the image of a winner to enough people until the first debate. The while reason I had to start me thread... is had to show the people he was a winner... and then he picked ryan... and we had to do the same thing again. in a way we needed someone more like christie but not new york area obnoxious. Rubio... if his parents had only been born in america.
Not all republicans want armed guards in the schools. I'm conservative and I don't like that idea. Many schools here have armed guards and they seem to get into trouble pretty often. They either get into fights with students or staff or they end up implicated in drug dealing. Some end up having inappropriate relations with students. I would prefer to see schools get a 3 part security system: Part 1) An alert system, similar to a fire alarm system that could be triggered from any classroom, main hallways or the administration office that would give a visual and audible warning in those locations. Part 2) Heavy locking doors for classrooms, entrances and admin offices that could be locked electronically by the alert system. Ground floor windows need a steel security grating. Part 3) Proper integration with the fire alarm/suppression system so that the security doors could not be locked in the event of a fire and, if already locked due to a security event when a fire was detected, would unlock. Yes, a badguy could simply light a fire and the system would unlock the doors but the detection of that fire would alert the 911 system or the security event would have alerted 911 and the fire department and law enforcement would be dispatched without waiting for someone to manage to call 911. Its all about heavy locking doors, secure ground floor windows and smart integration with the fire detection/suppression system.
ak is a nontrader who refuses to disclose his interest if any with respect to trading. then his AA action brother rcg claims to be an expert that makes money every day but yet found himself maladroitly lying in his journal to cover up his losses he got shit canned to chit chat. both are delusional jokes of the left
Sounds more like a problem with the idiots being hired as guards than the fact they're armed. You can't put former/future affirmative action TSA agents in those positions.
NO, I'm stating it as a fact. You have NO interest in trading. IF you do, what is it? This is at least the third time you've been asked.
his excuse will be he had you on ignore and thus didn't see our requests for clarification on his interest or obviously lack thereof.
Because I choose not to discuss trading with you doesn't make it fact.If you choose to think I have no interest in trading so be it,just don't lie and say that I said it