Bush came into office in Jan 2001.Q1 Q2 Q3 and Q4 of 2000 were all positive GDP with 4.2 unemployment That is not leaving an "economy in the dumps" as you stated
When I said you speak b.s. I did not expect you to provide proof with you next quote. I presented a link with a chart showing gdp to be negative in the first 3 quarters of 2001. then you stated gdp was positive? Perhaps you would like to explain the discrepancy between your statement and the chart I presented.
I feel the opposite, AK Forty Seven dings off more shit than a pin ball machine, it should be expected that he will throw out some bullshit on every post he has.
Different years jem.Your chart showed 2001,I said 2000. Do you not know the difference between 2000 and 2001 ?Bush was president the first 3 quarters of 2001,not Clinton .Bill Clinton's last year in office were all positive GDP Q1 Q2 Q3 and Q4 of 2000 *****I repeat 2000***** were all positive GDP with 4.2 unemployment or less
Interesting.I was just reading an article that came out today from republican Joe Scarborough who (Like me) mentioned that Bush got a good economy from Clinton http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56341.html By JOE SCARBOROUGH | 6/7/11 4:48 AM EDT Republicans who blame our current economic crisis on Obama either have short memories or no shame. The GOP owned Washington when it inherited a booming economy and a $155 billion budget surplus. Mr. Obama was not as fortunate. He inherited a broken financial system, a housing market in free fall and a debt that doubled during the Bush years.
what? talk about bull shit. Are you stating bush was responsible for the GDP in the first quarter of his presidency? How many times have you an Obama blamed Bush?