I read this guys posts and all I can think of is: How can someone be this stupid? He probably believes the communists burned down the Reichstag. Hapaboy, were you dropped on your head as a baby, or maybe molested in a vicious fashion. A skull fracture or two? You are seriously stupid. Please tell me which markets you trade.
It's good to be back at the CFR where I was a director. I never mentioned this when I was campaigning. Anyone with half a brain knows Cheney was behind the destructive 8 years under Bush where all jobs were exported. Watch how Rockefeller says how pleased he is that all jobs have been exported. Even low level fast food drive through order taking jobs being exported out. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BbnpN07J_zg&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BbnpN07J_zg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
what part of the idiots post made sense to you? The part where he is ashamed to be an American? Why is he then posting on the internet. The idiot should be in Iraq fighting Bush's war. And why am I not surprised the idiot is not in Iraq? Most Republicans who follow Bush are like Bush. Here is Bush explaining why he cut most Veteran benefits. Ha. <a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8954/idiotbushmm9.png" border="0" </a><br/>
Well if Bush had directly killed more Americans than Bin Laden than I would agree with you. However if Bin Laden actually killed more Americans directly than Bush had than I would question the stance of someone who in fact thinks its the opposite. However sense Bush is a leading factor towards why troops are still in Iraq than you can hold him somewhat responsible (not entirely because you know there is a congress) for the death of troops that have been killed by terrorists. So basically I think it is agreeable that Bin Laden deserves much more hatred than Bush although I understand your disgust with that fact that Bush is an indiret factor leading to the death of troops. Make sense?
You must be confused also. According to Bush, Bin Laden was never a threat Here he is explaining in his own words: Bush tells reporters during a press conference that he isn't concerned about bin Laden only 6 months after 9/11, then lies about it during the 2004 Debates <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JRY_BOYeySc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JRY_BOYeySc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Maybe you know better than Bush? well maybe you do. After all the idiot can't point out the United States in the world map.
I don't think we are communicating on the same page here. I addressed and compared the degree of hatred Bin Laden and Bush both deserve because I think you displayed a greater hatred for Bush than you do for Bin Laden. I could care less about what comments Bush flipped flopped on in a debate that was four years ago. You called the comments of hapaboy stupid because he was ashamed of people with the opinion that Bush and Cheney created 9/11 when Bin Laden took full responsibility for it. Do you think Bush and Cheney created 9/11? If you do than I understand why you think Hapaboys comments were stupid. But if you think Bush and Cheney created 9/11 than you must also disagree with the vice chairmen of the 9/11 commission Lee Hamilton who says that the evidence doesn't lead that way at all.
Former VP Dick Cheney warns of nuclear attack on United States under President Obama Where is Bin Laden now? the great Republican bogeyman. I'll bet Bin Laden votes a straight Republican ticket. Now you know why Bush/Cheney helped airlift Bin Laden into Pakistan. Bin Laden voted for Bush. <object width="425" height="344"><param name=""movie"" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3NbQiSQFFh0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name=""allowFullScreen"" value="true"></param><param name=""allowscriptaccess"" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3NbQiSQFFh0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Now you can connect the dots and figure out why Cheney/Bush needs the Bin Laden bogeyman. When Cheney drops the nuclear bomb on your families, you'll know whose face will be on TV. There is so much hard evidence that anyone with half a brain knows Cheney/Bush was behind 911. When all flights were grounded on 9/11, only the commander-in-chief could have authorized the airlift of Bin ladens family members out of US airspace the day of 9/11. The first step in any criminal investigation is to round up all persons of interest, yet Bush let them go. Why?
Since you don't have a brain, how are you able to determine what those who do have a brain would know? By the way, are you taking care to change your safe houses on a regular basis so as to avoid being kidnapped by the domestic arm of Blackwater and sent to the FEMA extermination camps?