Chart: Rate of Change in Consumption Verus Rate of Change of S&P

Discussion in 'Trading' started by ByLoSellHi, Mar 29, 2007.

  1. Forecasting The Next Move In Equities

    Posted on Mar 29th, 2007 with stocks: DIA, SPY

    David Andrew Taylor submits:
    I got a few emails last night asking about my take on the direction of the equities markets. I've been missing one key ingredient to help me out in that analysis. But, I found a different way of determining what I have been looking for. Here's a chart comparing the rate of change in the S&P 500 (red, left scale) vs. the rate of change in consumption (blue, right scale):


    I really like this chart with its correlation. There are a few times when this correlation failed. The early 1980's was a great example. But, that's also when Reagonomics showed up in the world, and the government began to spend like there was no tomorrow. Personal consumption finally caught up a few years later. Also, during the mid-late 1990's there was another obvious push higher in equities when personal consumption failed to keep up. That would be the "new economy" and the dot com era when the way we function as human beings was forever to change, which was a justification for pushing equities up just because the company had a mere notion of going online. We all know how that turned out.

    What I found interesting was that there were times when PCE led the equities markets, and other times when just the opposite happened. It got to the point where I was comparing data line for line to see which bottomed or topped out first. Inevitably, however, the S&P always seemed to win the race, meaning, once there was change in the economy, and the markets caught on, nothing got in the way of the equities markets from winning the race either up or down.

    Now, let's look at the very end of the chart. The S&P is pushing slightly higher whereas the PCE is more or less meandering around towards nowhere. Well, perhaps lower. We're largely at an area where nothing is really clear. And that might be exactly why I'm getting so many emails asking which way. If I had to say, I'd say lower. That comes from the rate of growth in consumption -- which is leaning lower.
  2. Very interesting. Seems like S&P leads in most cases, which is consistent with a notion that markets reflect future economic moves.

    Any futures on PCE ? :)
  3. Look at 1970-71 and 2002.

    I find that fascinating. It really shows how deeply undervalued the S&P versus consumption was.
  4. Looks like a bunch of noise. Interesting though.