Change the tick increment in ES from 0.25 to 0.1

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by guy2, Aug 30, 2005.

Would you like to see the tick increment in the ES changed from 0.25 to 0.1?

  1. Yes

    115 vote(s)
    52.8%
  2. No

    61 vote(s)
    28.0%
  3. I don't care but wanted to click a voting button

    42 vote(s)
    19.3%
  1. but it would blow you away right? sidenote: would anybody recognize him or know that he was the real thing? I say no.


     
    #41     Aug 31, 2005
  2. Yes, I would be...thunderstruck.
     
    #42     Aug 31, 2005
  3. Ticksize ES = SP; NQ = ND.
    We'll all make a bit more money of it.
    (A few will make a lot less :D )
     
    #43     Aug 31, 2005
  4. We should fight every battle to obtain a reduction on the spread.

    I mean, compare the spread between the ES and the QQQQ: Why have we got to pay more$ to open position on ES?

    Why pay more to play indices that dont move when on stocks there's virtually no spread, it doesnt make sense.

    Or does it?
     
    #44     Aug 31, 2005
  5. I want it cost someone something to run in front of me. That's why I want a tick size which is not too large but large enough to matter. I don't want to be pennied to death.

    Imagine a poker game with no ante where people could look at their cards and throw them away at no cost. That's what you are suggesting with these micro increments.

    If you think you can make more money scooping up the 'big ass' spread, then do that. Nothing's stopping you. ES is not NASDAQ.
     
    #45     Aug 31, 2005
  6. They would still be killed by the blinds. :D
     
    #46     Aug 31, 2005
  7. Believe it or not, this statement will go over a lot of heads... :p
     
    #47     Aug 31, 2005
  8. Mine, especially.
     
    #48     Aug 31, 2005

  9. Yes, ES would be more likely to jump around like a nut case like
    YM acts like instead of a more steady like movement. Everyone
    would be fighting over $5 ticks...
     
    #49     Aug 31, 2005
  10. Let them fight. That's what markets are for.
     
    #50     Aug 31, 2005