Celebrating The 1 Year Defeat Of Hillary Clinton

I am sure you think that you do. That is your problem. BTW, aren't you the same bigot who who stated she knows what antisemitism better than Jews?

 

I look at American politics in a nonpartisan way. Supposedly the best two candidates you had last year were D. Trump and H. Clinton, which is sad but not unusual given recent history. When some posters on here started high fiving each other when Trump got elected, I couldn't understand it, and suggested that people given time that Trump would disappoint.

Guess we'll see. He's your guy.

 

It is more difficult in the US. We are a large country with a diverse people and diverse economy.

And you are.......well......Canada.....about the population size of one of our states.

99% of the energy and dialogue in Canada goes into trying to come up with ways that you are different from Americans. So far, you have come up with the idea that you have more moose and maple syrup- if we exclude Maine and Vermont. Keep trying though.

Probably we should just annex you and get it over with. Most Canadians would prefer that anyway. They just don't want to admit it.

 

and we here at et expressed concern that trump would not be able to beat the establishment. He was not the first choice for most of us. I would have voted for jeff zucker or bernie or madonna or probably anyone but van jones over hillary. Hillary was a traitor for money.

I believe I said a few times... that if all trump does is put a conservative on the court that would be enough for me. (another lefty in scalia's seat would have destroyed many of our constitutional rights as we know them. )

edit... no... I have no reason to believe van jones is not a patriot... a commie yes... but probably a patriot. I would have voted for van jones over hillary.

 

You elected Justin Bieber Trudeau, lol.

 

Senate panel approves Trump judicial nominee who has never tried a case


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...-trump-judicial-nominee-who-has-never-tried-a

 

WTF

 

Kagan had never been a judge before appointed to supreme court and never argued a case until one year before.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nce-minor-hurdle-despite-early-criticism.html

Wonder what thehill thought about that.

I can guess. DIVERSITY!! YEAH!!!!

 

I like the part where he's only practiced law for 3 yrs, and most of his work experience has been as a secretary for politicians.

 

I was thinking Jem should get his name out there..this guy was a blogger also but he went to Harvard.